Guru Denim Inc v. Tri-Star Trading Inc et al

Filing 61

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. Pursuant to the Court's May 21, 2013 Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff Guru Denim, Inc. ("Plaintiff") against Defendant Tri-Star T rading, Inc. ("Tri-Star") in the amount of $500,000, plus costs., in favor of Guru Denim Inc against Tri-Star Trading Inc in the principal amount of $500,000, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $0.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

1
2
3

FILED: 5/21/13

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Tri-Star Trading, Inc., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )

Guru Denim, Inc.,

CASE NO. CV 12-2163-GHK (AGRx)
JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court’s October 17, 2012 Order, which entered a consent judgment
against Defendant Jenuine (“Jenuine”), Jenuine is dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to
the Court’s May 15, 2013 Order, which entered a consent judgment against Defendants
Street Denim, Inc. and Yousef Althkefati, erroneously sued as “Youseff Althtefuti”
(collectively, “Street Denim Defendants”), the Street Denim Defendants are dismissed
with prejudice. Pursuant to the Court’s April 2, 2013 Order, Defendants JC & JQ, Inc.
and Jae O. Ha are dismissed with prejudice.
Pursuant to the Court’s May 21, 2013 Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff Guru
Denim, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant Tri-Star Trading, Inc. (“Tri-Star”) in the
amount of $500,000, plus costs.
Further, pursuant to the Court’s May 21, 2013 Order, Tri-Star, its agents, servants,

1

employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, who receive

2

actual notice of the injunction, are hereby restrained and enjoined from, without

3

Plaintiff’s permission:

4

(a) Manufacturing, importing, purchasing, distributing, advertising, offering for

5

sale, and/or selling any products which bear marks identical and/or confusingly

6

similar to the following trademarks: U.S. Reg. No. 3,561,466; U.S. Reg. No.

7

3,147,244; U.S. Reg. No. 3,482,001; and U.S. Reg. No. 3,568,127 (collectively,

8

“True Religion Marks”);

9

(b) Using the True Religion Marks or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or

10

colorable imitation thereof in connection with the manufacture, importation,

11

distribution, advertisement, offer for sale and/or sale of merchandise;

12

(c) Passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any products or

13

other items that are not True Religion’s genuine merchandise as genuine True

14

Religion merchandise;

15

(d) Leasing space to any tenant who is engaged in the unauthorized manufacturing,

16

purchasing, production, distribution, circulation, sale, offering for sale,

17

importation, exportation, advertisement, promotion, display, shipping, marketing

18

of products which bear marks/designs identical, substantially similar, and/or

19

confusingly similar to the True Religion Marks;

20

(e) Committing any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe that

21

Defendants’ products are True Religion’s genuine merchandise unless they are

22

such;

23

(f) Shipping, delivering, holding for sale, distributing, returning, transferring

24

or otherwise moving, storing or disposing of in any manner items falsely bearing

25

the True Religion Marks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable

26

imitation thereof; and

27

(g) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or entity in

28
2

1

performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs (a) to (f)

2

above.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

DATED: May 21, 2013

5
6

_______________________________
GEORGE H. KING
Chief United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3