MHF Zweite Academy Film GmbH and Co KG et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et al

Filing 41

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 40 . The Court hereby approves and grants the Stipulated Protective Order with the following modification: Paragraph 5.1(b) is limited to testimony given in deposition and does not govern other pretrial or trial testimony. (hr)

Download PDF
1 7 Lawrence Peitzman (State Bar No. 62379) lpeitzman@peitzmanweg.com James P. Menton, Jr. (State Bar No. 159032) jmenton@peitzmanweg.com David B. Shemano (State Bar No. 176020) dshemano@peitzmanweg.com Lucas A. Messenger (State Bar No. 217645) lmessenger@peitzmanweg.com PEITZMAN WEG, LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 552-3100 Facsimile: (310) 552-3101 8 Counsel for Defendants 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MHF ZWEITE ACADEDMY FILM GMBH & CO. KG, et al., 12 13 Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: CV12-02381-JFW (JCx) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION 14 15 WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., 16 17 18 19 Defendants WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., et al., Counterclaimants, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. MHF ZWEITE ACADEDMY FILM GMBH & CO. KG, et al., Counterdefendants. Judge: Honorable John F. Walter Magistrate Judge: Honorable Jacqueline Chooljian 1 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, and finding 2 good cause therefore, the Court hereby approves and grants the Stipulated Protective 3 Order with the following modification: Paragraph 5.1(b) is limited to testimony given 4 in deposition and does not govern other pretrial or trial testimony. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated:  September 25, 2012                                           /s/  Honorable Jacqueline Choolijian United States Magistrate Judge  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?