MHF Zweite Academy Film GmbH and Co KG et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et al
Filing
41
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 40 . The Court hereby approves and grants the Stipulated Protective Order with the following modification: Paragraph 5.1(b) is limited to testimony given in deposition and does not govern other pretrial or trial testimony. (hr)
1
7
Lawrence Peitzman (State Bar No. 62379)
lpeitzman@peitzmanweg.com
James P. Menton, Jr. (State Bar No. 159032)
jmenton@peitzmanweg.com
David B. Shemano (State Bar No. 176020)
dshemano@peitzmanweg.com
Lucas A. Messenger (State Bar No. 217645)
lmessenger@peitzmanweg.com
PEITZMAN WEG, LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 552-3100
Facsimile: (310) 552-3101
8
Counsel for Defendants
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
MHF ZWEITE ACADEDMY FILM
GMBH & CO. KG, et al.,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No.: CV12-02381-JFW (JCx)
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH
MODIFICATION
14
15
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT,
INC., et al.,
16
17
18
19
Defendants
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT
INC., et al.,
Counterclaimants,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
MHF ZWEITE ACADEDMY FILM
GMBH & CO. KG, et al.,
Counterdefendants.
Judge: Honorable John F. Walter
Magistrate Judge: Honorable Jacqueline
Chooljian
1
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, and finding
2
good cause therefore, the Court hereby approves and grants the Stipulated Protective
3
Order with the following modification: Paragraph 5.1(b) is limited to testimony given
4
in deposition and does not govern other pretrial or trial testimony.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: September 25, 2012
/s/
Honorable Jacqueline Choolijian
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?