Salvador Bravo v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al
Filing
14
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A. and First Franklin Financial Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss 8 is GRANTED and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal with prejudice. Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (gk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 12-2608 CAS(SPx)
Title
SALVADOR BRAVO v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.; ET AL.
Present: The Honorable
Date
June 25, 2012
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
CATHERINE JEANG
Deputy Clerk
Anne Kielwasser
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Richard Kim
Proceedings:
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (filed 5/21/2012)
On March 27, 2010, pro se plaintiff Salvador Bravo filed this action against
defendants Quality Loan Service Corp., Wells Fargo, N.A., and First Franklin Financial
Corp. On May 17, 2012, Quality Loan Service Corp. filed a declaration of nonmonetary
status. On May 21, 2012, Wells Fargo and First Franklin filed a motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to defendants’ motion and failed to attend oral
argument. Accordingly, defendants’ motion is GRANTED and plaintiff’s complaint is
dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. L.R. 7-12 (“The failure to file any required paper,
or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or
denial of the motion.”). Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to amend his complaint.
Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in
dismissal with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00
Initials of Preparer
CV-12-2608(6/25)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
03
CMJ
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?