Salvador Bravo v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al

Filing 14

MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A. and First Franklin Financial Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss 8 is GRANTED and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal with prejudice. Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 12-2608 CAS(SPx) Title SALVADOR BRAVO v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.; ET AL. Present: The Honorable Date June 25, 2012 CHRISTINA A. SNYDER CATHERINE JEANG Deputy Clerk Anne Kielwasser Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Richard Kim Proceedings: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (filed 5/21/2012) On March 27, 2010, pro se plaintiff Salvador Bravo filed this action against defendants Quality Loan Service Corp., Wells Fargo, N.A., and First Franklin Financial Corp. On May 17, 2012, Quality Loan Service Corp. filed a declaration of nonmonetary status. On May 21, 2012, Wells Fargo and First Franklin filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to defendants’ motion and failed to attend oral argument. Accordingly, defendants’ motion is GRANTED and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. L.R. 7-12 (“The failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion.”). Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 Initials of Preparer CV-12-2608(6/25) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL : 03 CMJ Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?