Anthony Yuzwa v. M V Oosterdam et al

Filing 73

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 72 , Plaintiff's entire Second Amended Complaint, and all causes of action therein be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants named therein, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Stiletto Television, Inc., which was a named defendant that was dismissed without prejudice earlier in the litigation, is now deemed to be dismissed with prejudice. All parties are to bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY YUZWA, an individual Case No. CV12-2663 CAS (AJWx) 12 Plaintiff 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 vs. M/V OOSTERDAM, IMO Number 9221281, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, and appurtenances, in rem; HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC., a Washington corporation; HASTINGS, CLAYTON & TUCKER, INC., d/b/a STILETTO ENTERTAINMENT, a Nevada corporation; ; in personam, and DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Complaint filed: March 28, 2012 Trial Date: February18, 2014 Judge: Christina A. Snyder Defendants. 23 24 Having reviewed the Stipulation Re: Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice 25 entered into between the parties to this action, Plaintiff Anthony Yuzwa (hereinafter 26 “Plaintiff”), Defendant HAL MARITIME LTD. (erroneously sued as Holland America 27 Line Inc. and hereinafter “HAL MARITIME”), Defendant M/V OOSTERDAM, IMO 28 1 Case No. CV12-2663 CAS (AJWx) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Number 9221281, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, and appurtenances, in rem (hereinafter “OOSTERDAM”), and Defendant HASTINGS, CLAYTON & TUCKER, INC., d/b/a STILETTO ENTERTAINMENT (hereinafter “STILETTO”), and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Said stipulation is made as the result of an out-of-court settlement of the action by and between all parties to this action; 2. Plaintiff’s entire Second Amended Complaint, and all causes of action therein, in the above-captioned action, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants named therein, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 3. Stiletto Television, Inc., which was a named defendant that was dismissed without prejudice earlier in the litigation, is now deemed to be dismissed with prejudice; 4. All parties are to bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 5. This court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction over all disputes between or among the parties arising out of the settlement agreement reached between the parties thereto. 16 17 18 Dated: January 16, 2014 19 _________________________________ Honorable Christina A. Snyder 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. CV12-2663 CAS (AJWx) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?