Ahmad Nonahal v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, The Court notes that plaintiff has failed to file the appropriate proof of service establishing that defendant has been served. Plaintiff is directed to the Courts Case Management Order that required service to be completed and proof thereof to be filed within 28 days of that Order. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before June 1, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will be submitted upon the filing of plaintiffs response. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a proof of service or other response to this Order to Show Cause may result in the Court recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(l) and 4(m). (lmh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 12-2712-GHK (JEM) Title AHMAD NONAHAL v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Present: The Honorable Date May 25, 2012 JOHN E. MCDERMOTT, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. Anthony Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE The Court notes that plaintiff has failed to file the appropriate proof of service establishing that defendant has been served. Plaintiff is directed to the Court’s Case Management Order that required service to be completed and proof thereof to be filed within 28 days of that Order. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before June 1, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will be submitted upon the filing of plaintiff’s response. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a proof of service or other response to this Order to Show Cause may result in the Court recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(l) and 4(m). : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL sa Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?