In Re: Georges Marciano
Filing
8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court ORDERS the partiesin each of the above actions to meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report by no later than 7/9/2012 (see attached Minute Order for further details). (jp)
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 11-8470 AHM
CV 11-9120 AHM
CV 11-9216 AHM
CV 12-0545 AHM
CV 12-1284 AHM
CV 12-1887 AHM
CV 12-2601 AHM
CV 12-2890 AHM
CV 12-2978 AHM*
Title
In Re: Georges Marciano
Present: The
Honorable
Date
June 29, 2012
A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Stephen Montes
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs:
Proceedings:
Tape No.
Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)
On January 30, 2012, the Court ordered the parties in the four then-pending
appeals to file a Joint Status Report as to the status of each of the four appeals and their
relationships to each other. The Court instructed the parties to explain whether a ruling in
one case could moot the need to rule in another.
There are now nine pending appeals. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties
in each of the above actions to meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report by no later
than Monday, July 9, 2012. The status report shall address the following questions:
(1) What are the relationships between each of these nine appeals?
(2) Will a ruling in one case moot the need to rule in another case or affect the
ruling in another case? In other words, the parties should propose a logical
sequence for the resolution of these appeals.
(3) Are any of the appeals that were previously stayed still stayed?
(4) Which of these appeals are fully briefed and ready for review?
(5) What future appeals are contemplated?
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
SMO
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?