Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filing
122
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 119 . See document for details. (yb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS Case No: 2:12-cv-03211-JAK-(AJWx)
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
PROTECTIVE ORDER
13
Plaintiff,
EXCLUDING PROSECUTION BAR
PROVISIONS IN PARAGRAPH 24
14
v.
12
15
TOSHIBA CORPORATION and
TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION
16 SYSTEMS, INC.
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
To expedite the flow of discovery material, to facilitate the prompt
2
resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately
3
protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that only
4
materials the parties are entitled to keep confidential are subject to such treatment,
5
and to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such
6
materials in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
7
26(c), it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
8
A.
Definitions
1.
9
“Party”: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors,
10
employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support
11
staff).
12
2.
“Material”: all information, documents, testimony, and things
13
produced, served or otherwise provided in this action by the Parties or by non-
14
parties.
15
3.
“Designating Party”: a Party or non-party that designates information,
16
documents, or things for production in disclosures, or in responses to discovery as
17
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” and/or “ATTORNEYS’
18
EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE.”
19
4.
“CONFIDENTIAL” Material: information, documents, and things the
20
Designating Party believes in good faith is not generally known to others, and that
21
the Designating Party (i) would not normally reveal to third parties except in
22
confidence, or has undertaken with others to maintain in confidence, or
23
(ii) believes in good faith is protected by a right to privacy under federal or state
24
law, or any other applicable privilege or right related to confidentiality or privacy.
25
5.
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material: information, documents,
26
and things the Designating Party believes in good faith is not generally known to
27
others, and has significant competitive value such that unrestricted disclosure to
28
others would create a substantial risk of serious injury, and that the Designating
1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
Party (i) would not normally reveal to third parties except in confidence, or has
2
undertaken with others to maintain in confidence, or (ii) believes in good faith is
3
significantly sensitive and protected by a right to privacy under federal or state law
4
or any other applicable privilege or right related to confidentiality or privacy. Any
5
technical document designated as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” is automatically
6
subject to the Prosecution Bar provision set forth in Section G Below.
6.
7
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE”: RTL, HDL,
8
microcode, or other sensitive code (collectively, “SOURCE CODE”) that the
9
Designating Party believes in good faith is not generally known to others, and has
10
significant competitive value such that unrestricted disclosure to others would
11
create a substantial risk of serious injury, and that the Designating Party (i) would
12
not normally reveal to third parties except in confidence, or has undertaken with
13
others to maintain in confidence, or (ii) believes in good faith is significantly
14
sensitive and protected under federal or state law, or any other applicable privilege
15
or right related to confidentiality or privacy. Any document designated as
16
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” is automatically subject to the
17
Prosecution Bar provision set forth in Section G Below.
(a)
18
7.
19
20
action.
8.
23
“Receiving Party”: a Party that receives Material from a Producing
9.
21
22
“Producing Party”: a Party or non-party that produces Material in this
“Designated Material”: Material that is designated
Party.
24
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
25
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” under this Order.
26
10.
“Counsel of Record”: (i) outside counsel who appears on the
27
pleadings as counsel for a Party, (ii) partners, principals, counsel, associates,
28
employees and contract attorneys of such outside counsel to whom it is reasonably
2
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
necessary to disclose the information for this litigation, including supporting
2
personnel employed by the attorneys, such as paralegals, legal translators, legal
3
secretaries, legal clerks and shorthand reporters, and/or (iii) independent legal
4
translators retained to translate in connection with this action, or independent
5
shorthand reporters retained to record and transcribe testimony in connection with
6
this action.
11.
7
“Outside Consultant”: a person with specialized knowledge or
8
experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by Counsel
9
of Record to serve as an expert witness, or as a consultant in this action, and who is
10
not a current employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party and who, at the time
11
of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a competitor
12
of a Party.
12.
13
“Professional Vendors”: persons or entities that provide litigation
14
support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; designing and
15
preparing exhibits, graphics, or demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data
16
in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors who have
17
been retained by Counsel of Record in this action, and who are not current
18
employees of a Party or of a competitor of a Party and who, at the time of
19
retention, are not anticipated to become employees of a Party or of a competitor of
20
a Party. This definition includes ESI vendors, professional jury or trial consultants
21
retained in connection with this litigation, and mock jurors retained by such
22
consultants to assist them in their work. Professional vendors do not include
23
consultants who fall within the definition of Outside Consultant.
24
B.
25
Scope
13.
The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Designated
26
Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted
27
therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof.
28
Nothing herein shall alter or change in any way the discovery provisions of the
3
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Court’s deadlines provided in the Court’s
2
scheduling orders. Identification of any individual pursuant to this Protective Order
3
does not make that individual available for deposition, or any other form of
4
discovery outside of the restrictions and procedures of the Federal Rules of Civil
5
Procedure, and the Court’s deadlines.
6
C.
7
Access To Designated Material
14.
CONFIDENTIAL Material: Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or
8
permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any
9
information, document or thing designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
10
(a)
Persons who appear on the face of Designated Material as an
author, addressee or recipient thereof;
11
12
(b)
Counsel of Record;
13
(c)
Up to three (3) employees of a Receiving Party (including a
14
parent company of a Receiving Party), and necessary secretarial
15
staff, who are responsible for providing oversight of or
16
assistance in the litigation, who have signed the
17
“Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By
18
Protective Order” attached hereto as Exhibit A, and provided an
19
executed copy to all Parties prior to receiving Designated
20
Material, however, as to Designated Material from third parties,
21
absent a court order or agreement of the third party, Designated
22
Material from third parties may not be disclosed to employees
23
of a Receiving Party;
24
(d)
If any Receiving Party believes that more than three (3)
25
employees require access to confidential material, that party
26
may negotiate the issue directly with the Producing Party;
27
28
(e)
Outside Consultants of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure
is reasonably necessary for this litigation, and who have signed
4
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
the “Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By
2
Protective Order” attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the
3
“Certification Of Consultant” attached hereto as Exhibit B;
(f)
4
Witnesses at deposition and/or trial, provided that such
5
witnesses may not retain copies of Designated Material unless
6
permitted by other provisions of this Order;
7
(g)
The Court and its personnel;
8
(h)
Any designated arbitrator or mediator who is assigned to hear
this matter, or who has been selected by the Parties, and his or
9
10
her staff, who have signed the “Acknowledgement and
11
Agreement To Be Bound By Protective Order” attached hereto
12
as Exhibit A, and the “Certification Of Consultant” attached
13
hereto as Exhibit B;
(i)
14
Court reporters and videographers employed in connection with
this case; and
15
(j)
16
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably
17
necessary for this litigation, including copy services, e-
18
discovery services, graphics vendors, trial service vendors and
19
translation services.
20
15.
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material and “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
21
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material: Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or
22
permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any
23
information, documents or things designated “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
24
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material only to the following,
25
in addition to those identified in Paragraphs 26-27 below regarding use of
26
Designated Material at depositions:
27
28
(a)
Persons who appear on the face of Designated Material as an
author, addressee or recipient thereof;
5
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
(b)
Counsel of Record;
2
(c)
Outside Consultants of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure
3
is reasonably necessary for this litigation, and who have signed
4
the “Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By
5
Protective Order” attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the
6
“Certification Of Consultant” attached hereto as Exhibit B;
7
(d)
The Court and its personnel;
8
(e)
Any designated arbitrator or mediator who is assigned to hear
this matter, or who has been selected by the Parties, and his or
9
10
her staff, who have signed the “Acknowledgement and
11
Agreement To Be Bound By Protective Order” attached hereto
12
as Exhibit A, and the “Certification Of Consultant” attached
13
hereto as Exhibit B;
(f)
14
Court reporters and videographers employed in connection with
this case; and
15
(g)
16
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably
17
necessary for this litigation, including copy services, e-
18
discovery services, graphics vendors, trial service vendors and
19
translation services.
20
16.
Each person to whom Designated Material may be disclosed, and who
21
is required to sign the “Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By
22
Protective Order” attached hereto as Exhibit A and, if applicable, the “Certification
23
Of Consultant” attached hereto as Exhibit B, shall do so, prior to the time such
24
Designated Material is disclosed to him or her.
25
17.
At the request of the Designating Party, persons not permitted access
26
to Designated Material under the terms of this Protective Order shall not be present
27
at depositions while the Designating Party’s Designated Material is discussed or
28
otherwise disclosed. Pretrial and trial proceedings shall be conducted in a manner,
6
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
subject to the supervision of the Court, to protect Designated Material from
2
disclosure to persons not authorized to have access to such Material. Any Party
3
intending to disclose or discuss Designated Material at pretrial or trial proceedings
4
must give advance notice to assure the implementation of the terms of this
5
Protective Order.
6
D.
7
Access By Outside Consultants
18.
Notice. If a Receiving Party wishes to disclose another Party’s
8
Designated Material to any Outside Consultant, such Receiving Party must provide
9
notice to counsel for the Designating Party, which notice shall include: (a) the
10
individual’s name and business title; (b) business address; (c) business or
11
profession; (d) the individual’s CV; (e) any previous or current relationship
12
(personal or professional) with any of the parties; (f) a list of other cases in which
13
the individual has testified (at trial or deposition) within the last five years; (g) a
14
list of all companies with which the individual has consulted or by which the
15
individual has been employed within the last four years (if any consultancy is
16
confidential, the parties shall meet and confer as to information needed by the
17
other Parties in order to evaluate the Outside Consultant’s work); and (h) a signed
18
copy of the “Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By Protective
19
Order” attached as Exhibit A, and the “Certification Of Consultant” attached
20
hereto as Exhibit B.
21
19.
Objections. The Designating Party shall have ten (10) days from
22
receipt of the notice specified in Paragraph 17 to object in writing to such
23
disclosure. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is
24
based. After the expiration of the 10-day period, if no objection has been asserted,
25
then Designated Material may be disclosed to the Outside Consultant pursuant to
26
the terms of this Order. However, if the Designating Party objects within the 10-
27
day period, the Receiving Party may not disclose Designated Material to the
28
challenged individual absent resolution of the dispute or Court Order. In the event
7
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
the Designating Party makes a timely objection, the parties shall promptly meet
2
and confer to try to resolve the matter by agreement. If the parties cannot reach an
3
agreement, then the party objecting to the disclosure shall raise this matter with the
4
Court and request an Order restricting such person’s access to the Protected
5
Material. Failure to raise this matter with the Court within ten (10) business days
6
after service of the objection shall be deemed approval, and the person(s) shall
7
thereafter be qualified to have access to Protected Material. If the objecting party
8
fails to file a motion for protective order within the prescribed period, any
9
objection to the Outside Consultant is waived, and Designated Material may
10
thereafter be disclosed to such individual (upon signing the “Acknowledgement
11
and Agreement To Be Bound By Protective Order” attached hereto as Exhibit A).
12
If the Objecting party timely raises this matter with the Court as set forth above,
13
Designated Material shall not be disclosed to the challenged individual until and
14
unless a final ruling allowing such disclosure is made by this Court, or by the
15
consent of the Objecting party, whichever occurs first.
16
E.
Production of ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE
17
Material
18
20.
19
Source code.
(a)
Unless otherwise agreed to in writing between the Producing
20
Party and the Receiving Party or otherwise produced by the
21
Producing Party directly to the Receiving Party, if SOURCE
22
CODE designated as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY -
23
SOURCE CODE” is to be made available for inspection,
24
SOURCE CODE designated as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
25
– SOURCE CODE” shall only be provided, upon request, on at
26
least two stand-alone computers (that is, computers not
27
connected to a network, Internet or a peripheral device) at
28
secure locations, to be made available during regular business
8
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
hours (9:00 am to 5:00 pm, local time) on reasonable notice of
2
at least two business days, absent exigent circumstances or
3
otherwise agreed to by the Producing Party. The parties agree to
4
negotiate access from 5:00 p.m. through midnight local time on
5
weekdays and will meet and confer individually in good faith to
6
provide such access. Upon reasonable notice, the parties agree
7
to provide reasonable access to secure locations on Saturdays
8
and Sundays and will meet and confer individually in good
9
faith to provide such access. The Receiving Party is expected
10
and agrees to make reasonable efforts to restrict its access to
11
normal business hours except where necessary to accommodate
12
the work schedules of its source code reviewers. The Producing
13
Party is expected and agrees to reasonably permit after hours
14
and weekend access to accommodate such circumstances. At
15
the Producing Party’s selection, the secure locations will be
16
either in California, and/or Washington, D.C., or other location
17
agreed to by the parties. The secure locations will be at the
18
offices of Counsel of Record, the offices of the producing party,
19
or an escrow facility. If the production of source code is at an
20
escrow facility, all reasonable costs associated therewith will be
21
shared equally between the Receiving Party and the Producing
22
Party other than costs associated with software for reviewing
23
the source code which shall be paid for by the party requesting
24
such software. If the production of source code is at a location
25
other than an escrow facility, the costs associated with software
26
for reviewing the SOURCE CODE shall be paid for by the
27
party requesting such software. Upon written request by the
28
Receiving Party, beginning one week prior to the beginning of
9
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
trial and continuing through the end of trial, access to the
2
source code must be provided under the same conditions and
3
with the same limitations and restrictions as provided in this
4
Paragraph in Los Angeles, California.
5
(b)
The Receiving Party (including all experts, consultants, lawyers
6
retained by the Receiving Party who may review the source
7
code under this Protective Order) may use and, to the extent
8
necessary, load onto the secure computer(s) searching or
9
analytical tools for inspection of the source code, so long as the
10
searching or other analytical tools for inspection of the source
11
code is disclosed by the Requesting Party at least two (2)
12
business days in advance of the inspection, providing however
13
that the Producing Party reserves all objections to any such
14
searching or analytical tools. The Receiving Party may create a
15
back-up copy of the source code on the stand-alone
16
computer(s). The searching or analytical tools may annotate,
17
number the lines of, and label the pages of, the backup copy of
18
the code. Any back-up copies will remain on the stand-alone
19
computer(s) and be subject to all of the provisions of this
20
Protective Order. The Receiving Party is permitted to use
21
laptop computers to take notes, record observations, etc., so
22
long as the laptop computers are never connected to the stand-
23
alone computer(s) and are not used to record the source code
24
itself.
25
(c)
The Producing Party must enable the Receiving Party to print
26
paper copies of code at the time of inspection by the Receiving
27
Party, which paper copies shall be limited to the aspects of the
28
code directly necessary to the issues in the case. Furthermore,
10
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
the parties will also exchange (by hand delivery or overnight
2
delivery) copies of the paper copies of source code to be used as
3
exhibits for court proceedings, expert reports, and at
4
depositions, when so used. These additional copies will be
5
treated the same as the original print outs.
6
21.
The Producing Party will produce source code in computer searchable
7
format at the secure location in the manner described above in Paragraph 19, but
8
need not produce executable code, unless requested by the Receiving Party. The
9
Producing Party also need not produce prior versions of the source code, unless
10
requested by the Receiving Party. All source code produced shall be organized in
11
one or more separate directories corresponding to accused product(s) and/or
12
accused model numbers or in the same directory structure as the source code is
13
kept or compiled in the ordinary course of business. Further, to the extent files for
14
one particular version of source code are grouped together in a single folder in the
15
ordinary course of the Producing Party’s business, the Producing Party shall
16
produce the source code in that manner. If, for any reasons, source code files are
17
not produced for review, but, in the Receiving Party’s sole determination, such
18
missing source code is deemed to be necessary to understand the operation of the
19
accused products, the parties agree to promptly meet and confer over the
20
production of any and all missing source code files requested by the Receiving
21
Party in a timely manner in the format described above. The Producing Party shall
22
not undertake any effort to determine which pages or portions of source code have
23
been reviewed. The Producing Party shall not videotape the actual review of the
24
source code by the Receiving Party. The Producing Party is permitted to audit the
25
review of the source code by the Receiving Party from time to time with
26
reasonable advance notice (e.g., a knock on the door of the room at the secure
27
location), but will not interfere with any work-product or listen to other private
28
communications between the Receiving Party reviewing the source code.
11
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
22.
The Producing Party will enable the Receiving Party to print paper
2
copies of specific portions of SOURCE CODE designated as “ATTORNEYS’
3
EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” at the time of inspection by the Receiving
4
Party, which the Receiving Party may take when completing an inspection. The
5
Producing Party shall maintain a SOURCE CODE Access Log identifying, for
6
each and every time any SOURCE CODE is viewed, or accessed at the secure
7
location: (1) the name of each person who accessed the SOURCE CODE; (2) the
8
date and time of access; (3) the length of time of access; and (4) whether any hard
9
copies of any portion of SOURCE CODE were printed. Upon printing, the
10
Producing Party shall promptly Bates label the printed portions of the code and
11
provide a copy to the Receiving Party. The Producing Party shall also retain copies
12
of any portions of SOURCE CODE printed. The entire code or an unnecessarily
13
large portion of the code shall not be printed. The Receiving Party shall maintain a
14
log of all files that are printed or photocopied. Paper copies of SOURCE CODE
15
designated as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” shall include
16
Bates number and confidentiality labels when printed. The Receiving Party or
17
Outside Consultants of the Receiving Party shall keep the printouts or photocopies
18
in a secured locked area in the office of the Counsel of Record when not in use.
19
The Receiving Party and Outside Consultants may also temporarily keep the
20
printouts or photocopies at: (i) the sites where any depositions relating to the
21
SOURCE CODE are taken for the dates associated with the taking of the
22
deposition; (ii) the Court; or (iii) any intermediate location reasonably necessary to
23
transport the information (e.g., a hotel prior to a deposition). SOURCE CODE
24
may not be transported or transmitted electronically over a network of any kind,
25
including a LAN, an intranet, or the Internet.
26
27
28
12
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
F.
Financial Summaries
23.
2
For the mutual convenience of the parties, a Producing Party may
3
generate certain financial summaries for the purpose of this litigation. To the extent
4
a Producing Party produces such financial summaries in a digital format (e.g.,
5
PDF, TIFF, Word, or Excel file) and password protects such summaries, the
6
Receiving Party will maintain such password protection.
7
G.
24.
8
9
Prosecution Bar
Prosecution Bar. The parties note that they have differing views
regarding the appropriate prosecution bar, they have briefed the issues regarding
10
the appropriate prosecution bar (Doc. Nos. 93, 109, 110), and the Court held a
11
hearing regarding the prosecution bar provision on May 20, 2013. The parties
12
agree that the status quo shall remain in effect with respect to the prosecution bar
13
issue until the Court rules on the issue.
14
15
16
H.
Use Of Designated Material
25.
Use Of Designated Material By Receiving Party. Unless otherwise
17
ordered by the Court, or agreed to in writing by the Parties, all Designated
18
Material, and all information derived therefrom, shall be used by the Receiving
19
Party only for purposes of this litigation, except as described below in this
20
Paragraph 25 and shall not be used in any other way, or for any other purpose,
21
including the acquisition, preparation or prosecution before the Patent Office of
22
any patent, patent application, for drafting or revising patent claims, or in
23
connection with patent licensing. Information contained or reflected in Designated
24
Materials shall not be disclosed in conversations, presentations by parties or
25
counsel, in court or in other settings that might reveal Designated Material, except
26
in accordance with the terms of this Order.
27
28
26.
Use Of Designated Material By Designating Party. Nothing in this
Order shall limit any Designating Party’s use of its own documents and
13
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
information, nor shall it prevent the Designating Party from disclosing its own
2
confidential information, documents or things to any person. Such disclosure shall
3
not affect any designations made pursuant to the terms of this Order, so long as the
4
disclosure is made in a manner that is reasonably calculated to maintain the
5
confidentiality of the information.
6
27.
Use of Designated Material at Depositions. Except as may be
7
otherwise ordered by the Court, any person may be examined as a witness at
8
depositions and trial, and may testify concerning all Designated Material of which
9
such person has prior knowledge. The following general guidelines also apply:
10
(a)
A present director, officer, employee, designated Rule 30(6)(b)
11
witness, and/or Outside Consultant of a Producing Party may be
12
examined, and may testify concerning all Designated Material
13
that has been produced by that party;
14
(b)
A former director, officer, agent and/or employee of a
15
Producing Party may be interviewed, examined and may testify
16
concerning all Designated Material of which he or she has prior
17
knowledge, including any Designated Material that refers to
18
matters of which the witness has personal knowledge, that has
19
been produced by that Party and that pertains to the period or
20
periods of his or her employment; and
21
(c)
non-parties may be examined or may testify concerning any
22
document containing Designated Material of a Producing Party
23
that appears on its face, or from other documents or testimony,
24
to have been received from, or communicated to, the non-party
25
as a result of any contact or relationship with the Producing
26
Party, or a representative of such Producing Party. Any person
27
other than the witness, his or her attorney(s), and any person
28
qualified to receive Designated Material under this Order, shall
14
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
be excluded from the portion of the examination concerning
2
such information, unless the Producing Party consents to
3
persons other than qualified recipients being present at the
4
examination. If the witness is represented by an attorney who is
5
not qualified under this Order to receive such information, then
6
prior to the examination, the attorney shall be requested to sign
7
the “Acknowledgement and Agreement To Be Bound By
8
Protective Order” attached as Exhibit A. In the event that such
9
attorney declines to sign the Acknowledgement and Agreement
10
To Be Bound By Protective Order prior to the examination, the
11
parties, by their attorneys, shall jointly seek a protective order
12
from the Court prohibiting such attorney from disclosing such
13
Designated Material.
14
28.
A witness who previously had access to a document designated
15
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE
16
CODE” but who is not under a present non-disclosure agreement with the
17
Producing Party that covers that document, may be shown the document if the
18
witness is advised on the record of the existence of the Protective Order and that
19
the protective order requires the parties to keep confidential any questions,
20
testimony or documents that are designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”,
21
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE
22
CODE.” The witnesses may not copy, take notes on or retain copies of any
23
Designated Material used or reviewed at the deposition. The witness may not take
24
out of the deposition room any exhibit that is marked “CONFIDENTIAL”,
25
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE
26
CODE.” The Producing Party of any Designated Material used at the deposition
27
may also require that the transcript and exhibits not be copied by the witness or his
28
counsel, that no notes may be made of the transcript or the exhibits, and that the
15
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
transcript and exhibits may only be reviewed by the witness in the offices of one of
2
the counsel representing a party in this case (or another firm acting for one of the
3
counsel representing a party in this case and under the supervision of one of the
4
lawyers who is bound by the terms of this Order). The restrictions in this Paragraph
5
apply only to a witness who is not subject to this Order.
6
I.
7
Procedure for Designating Materials
29.
Subject to the limitations set forth in this Order, a Designating Party
8
may: designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” information that the Designating Party
9
believes, in good faith, meets the definition set forth in Paragraph 4 above;
10
designate as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information that it believes, in good
11
faith, meets the definition set forth in Paragraph 5 above; and designate as
12
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” information that it believes, in
13
good faith, meets the definition set forth in Paragraph 6 above..
14
30.
Except as provided above in Section E with respect to
15
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material, any material
16
(including physical objects) made available for initial inspection by counsel for the
17
Receiving Party prior to producing copies of selected items shall initially be
18
considered, as a whole, to constitute “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information,
19
and shall be subject to this Order. Thereafter, the Producing Party shall have ten
20
(10) calendar days from the inspection to review and designate the appropriate
21
documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” prior to
22
furnishing copies to the Receiving Party.
23
31.
Except as otherwise provided in this Order or as otherwise stipulated
24
or ordered, Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be
25
designated in accordance with this Section I before the Material is disclosed or
26
produced.
27
32.
28
Designation in conformity with this Order shall be made as follows:
(a)
For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of
16
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
depositions, or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the
2
Producing Party shall affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,”
3
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
4
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” on each page that contains
5
Designated Material.
6
(b)
For testimony given in deposition, or in other pretrial or trial
7
proceedings, the Designating Party shall specify any portions of
8
the testimony that it wishes to designate as
9
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
10
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE.” In the case
11
of depositions, the Designating Party may also designate any
12
portion of a deposition transcript as “CONFIDENTIAL,”
13
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
14
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” by informing the reporter, and
15
opposing Parties, in writing within thirty (30) calendar days of
16
completion of the deposition of the designations to be applied.
17
All deposition transcripts not marked at least
18
“CONFIDENTIAL” during the deposition will nonetheless be
19
treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” until the thirty (30) day period
20
has expired.
21
(c)
For information produced in some form other than
22
documentary, and for any other tangible items, the Producing
23
Party shall affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
24
container or containers in which the information or thing is
25
stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
26
ONLY” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE.”
27
28
(d)
The provisions of subparagraphs 32(a)-(c) do not apply to
documents produced in native format. For documents produced
17
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
in native format, the parties shall provide written notice to the
2
Receiving Party of any confidentiality designations at the time
3
of production, label the production medium and identify the
4
confidentiality in the filename of the document.
5
J.
No Waiver of Privilege
33.
6
Subject to the provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502, inspection
7
or production of documents (including physical objects) shall not constitute a
8
waiver of the attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or any other
9
applicable privilege or immunity, if, after a Party becomes aware of any such
10
disclosure, that Party designates any such documents as within the attorney-client
11
privilege, work product immunity or any other applicable privilege or immunity,
12
and requests in writing return or destruction of such documents. Upon request, the
13
Receiving Party shall immediately retrieve and return or destroy all copies of such
14
document(s). Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from challenging
15
the propriety of the attorney-client privilege, work product immunity or other
16
applicable privilege or immunity designation by submitting a written challenge to
17
the Court; provided, however, that such challenge shall not assert as a ground for
18
challenge the fact of the initial production or inspection of the documents later
19
designated as attorney-client privileged, work product, or subject to another
20
applicable privilege or immunity.
21
K.
22
Inadvertent Failure To Designate
34.
An inadvertent failure to designate qualified information, documents
23
or things as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
24
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” does not, standing alone,
25
waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such
26
material. Upon discovery of an inadvertent failure to designate, a Producing Party
27
may notify the Receiving Party in writing that the material is to be designated as
28
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
18
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
ONLY – SOURCE CODE.” Upon receipt of such notice, the Receiving Party must
2
make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
3
terms of this Order, subject to the right to challenge the propriety of such
4
designation(s). The Producing Party shall provide substitute copies of documents
5
bearing the confidentiality designation.
6
L.
Filing Designated Material
35.
7
Without written permission from the Designating Party or a Court
8
Order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file
9
in the public record in this action any Designated Material, but must file such
10
Designated Material under seal in conformance with the Court’s rules and
11
procedures. Material filed under seal shall bear the title of this matter, an indication
12
of the nature of the contents of such sealed filing, the words “CONFIDENTIAL
13
INFORMATION – UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
14
ONLY INFORMATION - UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or “ATTORNEYS’
15
EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE INFORMATION – UNDER PROTECTIVE
16
ORDER,” as appropriate, and a statement substantially in the following form:
This filing contains confidential information filed in this case by (name of
17
18
party) and its contents shall not be displayed or revealed except by order of the
19
Court presiding over this matter.
20
M.
21
Challenges to Confidentiality Designations
36.
The Parties will use reasonable care when designating documents or
22
information as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” and
23
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE.” Nothing in this Order shall
24
prevent a Receiving Party from contending that any or all documents or
25
information designated as CONFIDENTIAL Material, ATTORNEYS’ EYES
26
ONLY Material, or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material
27
have been improperly designated.
28
37.
If any Party disagrees with the designation of any documents or
19
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
information as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
2
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE,” then the parties to the dispute,
3
after providing notice to the Producing Party, shall attempt to resolve the dispute
4
informally and in good faith before presenting the dispute to the Court, in
5
accordance with C.D. Cal. L.R. 37-1. All documents and information objected to
6
shall continue to be treated as originally designated by the Producing Party,
7
pending resolution of the dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved informally,
8
then the objecting party may file an application with the Court seeking to have the
9
confidential designation removed or altered, in accordance with C.D. Cal. L.R. 37-
10
2. The Producing Party shall bear the burden of establishing that the documents
11
and/or information is properly designated pursuant to the terms of this Protective
12
Order. The documents and/or information shall continue to be treated as originally
13
designated by the Producing Party pending resolution of the dispute.
38.
14
A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of a
15
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
16
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” designation at the time made, and the failure to do so
17
shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Such a challenge shall be
18
written, shall be served on counsel for the Producing Party, and shall identify
19
particularly the documents or information that the Receiving Party contends should
20
be differently designated. The parties shall use their best efforts to resolve
21
promptly and informally such disputes in accordance with all applicable rules. If
22
agreement cannot be reached, the Receiving Party shall request that the Court
23
cancel or modify a “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
24
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” designation.
25
N.
Protected Material Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced In Other
26
Litigation
27
39.
28
If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or a court order that
would compel disclosure of any information, documents or things designated in
20
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
2
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE,” the Receiving Party must so
3
notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax and email) promptly, and in no
4
event more than ten (10) calendar days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such
5
notification must include a copy of the subpoena or order. The Receiving Party
6
also must immediately inform, in writing, the party who caused the subpoena or
7
order to issue that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is
8
subject to this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a
9
copy of this Protective Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused
10
the subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the
11
interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the
12
Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality
13
interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating
14
Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of
15
its Designated Material. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as
16
authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful
17
directive from another court.
18
O.
Unauthorized Disclosure Of Designated Material
40.
19
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has
20
disclosed Designated Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized
21
under this Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the
22
Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve
23
all copies of the Designated Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom
24
unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request
25
such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be
26
Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
27
P.
28
Non-Party Use of this Protective Order
41.
A non-party that produces Material voluntarily, or pursuant to a
21
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
subpoena or a court order, may designate such Material in the same manner, and
2
shall receive the same level of protection under this Protective Order, as any Party
3
to this lawsuit.
4
42.
A non-party’s use of this Protective Order to protect its
5
“CONFIDENTIAL” Material, “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material, or
6
“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material does not entitle that
7
non-party access to “CONFIDENTIAL” Material, “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
8
Material, or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Material
9
produced by any Party in this case.
10
11
Q.
Discovery from Outside Consultants
43.
Testifying experts’ draft reports, notes, and outlines of draft reports
12
shall not be subject to discovery in this case, nor shall any such drafts, notes or
13
outlines of draft reports that the testifying expert prepared in other cases be subject
14
to discovery in this case.
15
44.
Discovery of materials provided to testifying experts shall be limited
16
to those materials, facts, consulting expert opinions, and other matters actually
17
relied upon by the testifying expert in forming his or her final report, trial or
18
deposition testimony, or any opinion in this case. No discovery can be taken from
19
any consulting expert who does not testify, except to the extent that consulting
20
expert has provided information, opinions or other materials to a testifying expert,
21
who then relies upon such information, opinions or other materials in forming his
22
or her final report, trial or deposition testimony or any opinion in this case.
23
45.
No conversations or communications between Counsel of Record and
24
any testifying or consulting expert will be subject to discovery unless the
25
conversations or communications are relied upon by such experts in formulating
26
opinions that are presented in reports, trial or deposition testimony in this case.
27
28
46.
Materials, communications (including email) and other information
exempt from discovery under the foregoing Paragraphs shall be treated as attorney22
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
work product for the purposes of this litigation and Protective Order.
2
R.
Communications between Party and Counsel of Record
47.
3
The parties agree that privileged or protected communications
4
occurring on or after November 18, 2011 need not be recorded on the party’s
5
privilege log or produced in this case.
6
S.
Duration
48.
7
Even after the termination of this action, the confidentiality
8
obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party
9
agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.
10
T.
Final Disposition
49.
11
Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party,
12
within sixty (60) calendar days after the final termination of this action, each
13
Receiving Party must destroy or return all Designated Material to the Producing
14
Party. As used in this Paragraph, “all Designated Material” includes all copies,
15
abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing
16
any of the Designated Material. The Receiving Party must submit a written
17
confirmation of the return or destruction to the Producing Party (and, if not the
18
same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline.
19
Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel of Record may retain an archival copy of
20
all pleadings, motion papers, deposition transcripts (including exhibits), transcripts
21
of other proceedings (including exhibits), expert reports (including exhibits),
22
discovery requests and responses (including exhibits), exhibits offered or
23
introduced into evidence at trial, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney
24
work product, even if such materials contain Designated Material. Any such
25
archival copies that contain or constitute Designated Material remain subject to this
26
Protective Order as set forth in Section S (Duration), above.
27
U.
28
Miscellaneous
50.
Any of the notice requirements herein may be waived, in whole or in
23
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
part, but only by a writing signed by the Counsel of Record for the Party against
2
whom such waiver will be effective.
3
51.
This Order is entered without prejudice to the right of any Party to
4
apply to the Court at any time for modification of this Order, when convenience or
5
necessity requires. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek to
6
assert other objections. No Party waives any right it otherwise would have to
7
object to disclosing or producing any information, documents, or things on any
8
ground not addressed in this Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right
9
to object on any ground to the use in evidence of any of the material covered by
10
this Protective Order. The Court shall take appropriate measures to protect
11
Designated Material at trial and any hearing in this case.
12
52.
This Order shall not diminish any existing obligation or right with
13
respect to Designated Material, nor shall it prevent a disclosure to which the
14
Designating Party consents in writing before the disclosure takes place.
15
53.
The United States District Court for the Central District of California,
16
Western Division, is responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of this
17
Protective Order. All disputes concerning Designated Material produced under the
18
protection of this Protective Order shall be resolved by the United States District
19
Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. Every individual
20
who receives any Designated Material agrees to subject himself or herself to the
21
jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of any proceedings related to performance
22
under, compliance with, or violation of this Order.
23
24
SIGNED this 9th day of July, 2013.
/s/ Andrew J.Wistrich
25
26
27
The Honorable Andrew Wistrich
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
24
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
4
5
I, __________________________ [print or type full name], state:
6
1.
7
____________________________________________________________;
8
2.
9
____________________________________________________________;
My business address is
My present employer is
10
3.
My present occupation or job description
11
____________________________________________________________;
12
4.
I agree to keep confidential all information provided to me in the
13
matter of BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v.
14
TOSHIBA CORPORATION and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION
15
SYSTEMS, INC., Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-03211-JAK-AJW (C.D. Cal.) in the
16
United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western
17
Division, in accordance with the restrictions in the Protective Order, and to be
18
subject to the authority of that Court in the event of any violation or dispute related
19
to this Protective Order.
20
5.
I have been informed of and have reviewed the Protective Order
21
entered in this case, and I will not divulge any information, documents or things
22
that are subject to the Protective Order except in accordance with the provisions of
23
the Order;
24
25
26
27
28
25
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
6.
I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
2
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
3
Executed on _________________
4
5
6
7
________________________________________
[Printed name]
8
9
10
________________________________________
[Signature]
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
1
EXHIBIT B
2
CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT
3
4
I, _______________________________________________ [print or type
5
full name], of _______________________________________________ am not an
6
employee of the Party who retained me or of a competitor of the opposing Party
7
and will not use any information, documents, or things that are subject to the
8
Protective Order in the matter of BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS
9
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION and TOSHIBA
10
AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-03211-
11
JAK-AJW (C.D. Cal) for any purpose other than this litigation. If at any time after
12
I execute this Certificate of Consultant and during the pendency of the Action and
13
my retention, I decide to accept employment by a competitor of the opposing
14
Party, I will promptly (before I become employed) inform the counsel for the party
15
who retained me in the Action and the opposing party, and I will not thereafter
16
review any Designated Materials marked by the opposing Party as
17
”CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” OR “ATTORNEYS’ EYES
18
ONLY – SOURCE CODE” unless and until the Parties agree or the Court orders
19
otherwise.
20
I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
21
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
22
Executed on _________________
23
24
25
________________________________________
[Printed name]
26
27
28
________________________________________
[Signature]
27
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH COMPETING PROSECUTION BAR PROVISIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-03211-JAK-AJW
4839-8596-2772.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?