Ashkhen A Arutyunyan v. American Express Centurion Bank et al

Filing 73

IN CHAMBER/OFF THE RECORD. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on September 10, 2012. [Doc. No. 29.] In the FAC, Plaintiff alleges violations of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CCRAA), Cal. Civ . Code § 1785.25(a), against all defendants. It appears to the Court that Plaintiff may have no private right of action pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.25(a). See Pulver v. Avco Fin. Services, 182 Cal. App. 3d 622, 632 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986 ) (the Legislatures apparent intent in specifying that a right of action exists against any person for violation of the act (§ 1785.31, subd. (a)) was not to impose liability on a supplier of information to a credit reporting agency....) Plainti ffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than November 13, 2012 why Count II of the FAC for Violations of the CCRAA should not be dismissed as against all defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/13/2012. (cs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV12-04123 CBM (SH) Title Arutyunyan v. American Express Centurion Bank, et al. Present: The Honorable Date CONSUELO B. MARSHALL Joseph M. Levario n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: n/a Proceedings: November 5, 2012 n/a IN CHAMBERS/OFF THE RECORD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on September 10, 2012. [Doc. No. 29.] In the FAC, Plaintiff alleges violations of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.25(a), against all defendants. It appears to the Court that Plaintiff may have no private right of action pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.25(a). See Pulver v. Avco Fin. Services, 182 Cal. App. 3d 622, 632 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986) (“the Legislature’s apparent intent in specifying that a right of action exists against ‘any person’ for violation of the act (§ 1785.31, subd. (a)) was not to impose liability on a supplier of information to a credit reporting agency . . ..”) Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than November 13, 2012 why Count II of the FAC for “Violations of the CCRAA” should not be dismissed as against all defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 Initials of Preparer CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL : 00 JL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?