Otter Products LLC v. Equipped LLC et al

Filing 28

PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT by Judge John F. Walter. (kbr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698 E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697 E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227 E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com Ani S. Garibyan, SBN: 274846 E-mail: agaribyan@johnsonpham.com 6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 888-7540 Facsimile: (818) 888-7544 Attorneys for Plaintiff OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC Closed 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 Case No.: CV12-04189 JFW (Ex) OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, 19 PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 25 EQUIPPED, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company; ARI CIMENT, an Individual d/b/a DEAL.FISHER and d/b/a EQUIPPED LLC; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Complaint Filed: May 14, 2012 Defendants. 26 27 28 /// -1PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT 1 Having reviewed the Stipulation to Issuance of Permanent Injunction entered into 2 between Plaintiff OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants EQUIPPED, LLC and 3 ARI CIMENT (“Defendants”), and good cause appearing, the Court hereby finds as follows: 4 a. WHEREAS Plaintiff is the owner of numerous trademarks 5 which it uses in connection with the manufacture, distribution, sale and promotion 6 of a wide range of products, including high-quality protective cases, peripherals 7 and accessories for portable electronic devices and computers. Plaintiff owns all 8 rights in and to a family of federally registered trademarks which include the 9 following, among others (collectively, “Plaintiff’s Registered Marks”): 10 Trademark Reg. No. Reg. Date 11 OTTER BOX 2287619 October 19, 1999 12 [DESIGN MARK] 3791318 May 18, 2010 13 OTTER BOX 3788535 May 11, 2010 14 OTTERBOX 3788534 May 11, 2010 15 WE’VE GOT 3865367 October 19, 2010 16 TECHNOLOGY COVERED 17 DEFENDER SERIES 3623789 May 19, 2009 18 STRENGTH 4079672 January 3, 2012 19 COMMUTER SERIES 3963182 May 17, 2011 20 COMMUTER 3791317 May 18, 2010 21 IMPACT SERIES 3795187 March 10, 2010 22 REFLEX ZONE 4111433 March 13, 2012 23 REFLEX SERIES 3972039 May 31, 2011 24 UTILITY SERIES 4064940 25 ARMOR SERIES 3632231 June 2, 2009 26 PINK IS STRENGTH! 4053182 November 8, 2011 27 OTTERCARES 4101071 February 21, 2012 28 [DESIGN MARK] 4116998 March 27, 2012 November 29, 2011 -2PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT 1 2. WHEREAS Plaintiff also has numerous pending trademarks with the 2 United States Patent and Trademark Office. The serial numbers of Plaintiff’s 3 pending trademarks are as follows: 85416877; 85456430; 85458259; 85462689; 4 85483745; 85505980; 85576166; 85531307; 85505993; 85505986; 85505999; 5 85428337; 85288182; 85288187 and 85342514. 6 3. WHEREAS on May 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this 7 Civil Action No. Civil Action No. CV12-04189 JFW (Ex) against Defendants, 8 alleging causes of action under §32(1) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1114(1)) 9 for infringement of federally registered trademarks, under §43(c) of the Lanham 10 Act (15 U.S.C. 1125(c)) and California Business & Professions Code § 14247 for 11 dilution of federally registered and common law trademarks, under §43(a) of the 12 Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1125(a)) for unfair competition, and under the statutory 13 and common law of the State of California to enjoin Defendants’ current and 14 prospective infringement and dilution of the Plaintiff’s Marks and unfair 15 competition, and to recover monetary damages resulting from those actions. 16 17 18 4. WHEREAS Plaintiff served the summons and Complaint on Defendants on May 29, 2012. 5. WHEREAS Defendants are alleged to have sold no less than 10,000 19 units of alleged counterfeit OTTERBOX® products on eBay.com and 20 Amazon.com, seller ID “deal.fisher”. 21 6. WHEREAS after reviewing the papers and evidentiary support 22 provided to Defendants, Defendants have agreed to stipulate to the issuance of a 23 permanent injunction with respect to matters referenced in this Stipulation. 24 7. WHEREAS Defendants deny the allegations asserted by 25 OTTERBOX® and believes that it possesses defenses and claims it could interpose 26 against third parties. 27 28 8. WHEREAS the parties expressly waive any findings of fact, conclusions of law, statement of decision and any right to notice or right to be -3PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT 1 heard in any matter in connection with or arising out of the filing, rendition or 2 entry of the Permanent Injunction Order on this Stipulation for Entry of Permanent 3 Injunction, provided however, that no such waiver shall be deemed to exist insofar 4 as damages are concerned, it being agreed that Defendants may offer proof in 5 defense of Plaintiff’s claims for damages.9. WHEREAS the parties agree that the 6 permanent injunction shall remain in full force and effect through the final 7 disposition of this action and that any right to set aside the permanent injunction, 8 appeal therefrom or to otherwise attack its validity is hereby waived. 9 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants and its 10 agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, attorneys, representatives, successor 11 companies, related companies, and all persona acting in concert or participation 12 with it, and each of them, are, through the final disposition of this action, 13 PERMANENT ENJOINED from: 14 a. The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, 15 assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 16 distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing, 17 advertising or promotion of the counterfeit OTTERBOX® product identified in the 18 Complaint and any other unauthorized OTTERBOX® product (including any non- 19 genuine reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation thereof). 20 b. The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, 21 assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 22 distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing, 23 advertising or promotion of the infringing and diluting product identified in the 24 Complaint and any other product which infringes or dilutes any Plaintiff’s Mark, 25 trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, any of Plaintiff’s Marks 26 at issue in this action. 27 28 c. The unauthorized use, in any manner whatsoever, of any Plaintiff’s trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, the -4PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT 1 Plaintiff’s Marks at issue in this action, any variants, colorable imitations, 2 translations and/or simulations thereof and/or any items that are confusingly 3 similar thereto, including specifically: 4 i. on or in conjunction with any product or service; and 5 ii. on or in conjunction with any advertising, promotional 6 materials, labels, hangtags, packaging, or containers. 7 d. The use of any trademark, trade name, or trade dress that falsely 8 represents, or is likely to confuse, mislead or deceive purchasers, customers, or 9 members of the public to believe that unauthorized product imported, exported, 10 manufactured, reproduced, distributed, assembled, acquired, purchased, offered, 11 sold, transferred, brokered, consigned, distributed, stored, shipped, marketed, 12 advertised and/or promoted by Defendants originates from Plaintiff, or that said 13 merchandise has been sponsored, approved, licensed by, or associated with 14 Plaintiff or is, in some way, connected or affiliated with Plaintiff. 15 e. Engaging in any conduct that falsely represents that, or is likely to 16 confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, customers, or members of the public to 17 believe that Defendants themselves are connected with, or is in some way 18 sponsored by or affiliated with Plaintiff, purchases product from or otherwise has a 19 business relationship with Plaintiff. 20 f. Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the 21 manufacture, distribution, advertising, sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of 22 any goods, a false description or representation, including words or symbols, 23 tending to falsely describe or represent such goods as being those of Plaintiff. 24 g. Hiding, disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring 25 any and all products, advertising, promotional materials, labels, hangtags, 26 packaging or containers bearing any of Plaintiff’s Marks; and/or 27 28 h. Disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring any documents or things, including electronic records, pertaining to the purchase, -5PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT 1 procurement, development, making, manufacture, use, display, advertisement, 2 marketing, licensing, sale, offer for sale, distribution, shipping, or delivery of any 3 products or services bearing any Plaintiff’s Marks or which otherwise refer or 4 relate to Plaintiff or any of Plaintiff’s Marks. 5 6 7 10. This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendants at the time of its execution by the Court. 11. The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this 8 Permanent Injunction and, pursuant to Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 9 Procedure, the Court directs immediate entry of this Permanent Injunction against 10 11 Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 DATED: February 19, 2013 ___________________________________ Hon. John F. Walter United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?