Otter Products LLC v. Equipped LLC et al
Filing
28
PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT by Judge John F. Walter. (kbr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698
E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com
Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227
E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com
Ani S. Garibyan, SBN: 274846
E-mail: agaribyan@johnsonpham.com
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: (818) 888-7540
Facsimile: (818) 888-7544
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC
Closed
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
Case No.: CV12-04189 JFW (Ex)
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado
Limited Liability Company,
19
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS
EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI
CIMENT
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
22
23
24
25
EQUIPPED, LLC, a New York Limited
Liability Company; ARI CIMENT, an
Individual d/b/a DEAL.FISHER and
d/b/a EQUIPPED LLC; and DOES 1-10,
Inclusive,
Complaint Filed: May 14, 2012
Defendants.
26
27
28
///
-1PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
1
Having reviewed the Stipulation to Issuance of Permanent Injunction entered into
2
between Plaintiff OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants EQUIPPED, LLC and
3
ARI CIMENT (“Defendants”), and good cause appearing, the Court hereby finds as follows:
4
a.
WHEREAS Plaintiff is the owner of numerous trademarks
5
which it uses in connection with the manufacture, distribution, sale and promotion
6
of a wide range of products, including high-quality protective cases, peripherals
7
and accessories for portable electronic devices and computers. Plaintiff owns all
8
rights in and to a family of federally registered trademarks which include the
9
following, among others (collectively, “Plaintiff’s Registered Marks”):
10
Trademark
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
11
OTTER BOX
2287619
October 19, 1999
12
[DESIGN MARK]
3791318
May 18, 2010
13
OTTER BOX
3788535
May 11, 2010
14
OTTERBOX
3788534
May 11, 2010
15
WE’VE GOT
3865367
October 19, 2010
16
TECHNOLOGY COVERED
17
DEFENDER SERIES
3623789
May 19, 2009
18
STRENGTH
4079672
January 3, 2012
19
COMMUTER SERIES
3963182
May 17, 2011
20
COMMUTER
3791317
May 18, 2010
21
IMPACT SERIES
3795187
March 10, 2010
22
REFLEX ZONE
4111433
March 13, 2012
23
REFLEX SERIES
3972039
May 31, 2011
24
UTILITY SERIES
4064940
25
ARMOR SERIES
3632231
June 2, 2009
26
PINK IS STRENGTH!
4053182
November 8, 2011
27
OTTERCARES
4101071
February 21, 2012
28
[DESIGN MARK]
4116998
March 27, 2012
November 29, 2011
-2PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
1
2.
WHEREAS Plaintiff also has numerous pending trademarks with the
2
United States Patent and Trademark Office. The serial numbers of Plaintiff’s
3
pending trademarks are as follows: 85416877; 85456430; 85458259; 85462689;
4
85483745; 85505980; 85576166; 85531307; 85505993; 85505986; 85505999;
5
85428337; 85288182; 85288187 and 85342514.
6
3.
WHEREAS on May 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this
7
Civil Action No. Civil Action No. CV12-04189 JFW (Ex) against Defendants,
8
alleging causes of action under §32(1) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1114(1))
9
for infringement of federally registered trademarks, under §43(c) of the Lanham
10
Act (15 U.S.C. 1125(c)) and California Business & Professions Code § 14247 for
11
dilution of federally registered and common law trademarks, under §43(a) of the
12
Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1125(a)) for unfair competition, and under the statutory
13
and common law of the State of California to enjoin Defendants’ current and
14
prospective infringement and dilution of the Plaintiff’s Marks and unfair
15
competition, and to recover monetary damages resulting from those actions.
16
17
18
4.
WHEREAS Plaintiff served the summons and Complaint on
Defendants on May 29, 2012.
5.
WHEREAS Defendants are alleged to have sold no less than 10,000
19
units of alleged counterfeit OTTERBOX® products on eBay.com and
20
Amazon.com, seller ID “deal.fisher”.
21
6.
WHEREAS after reviewing the papers and evidentiary support
22
provided to Defendants, Defendants have agreed to stipulate to the issuance of a
23
permanent injunction with respect to matters referenced in this Stipulation.
24
7.
WHEREAS Defendants
deny
the
allegations
asserted
by
25
OTTERBOX® and believes that it possesses defenses and claims it could interpose
26
against third parties.
27
28
8.
WHEREAS the parties expressly waive any findings of fact,
conclusions of law, statement of decision and any right to notice or right to be
-3PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
1
heard in any matter in connection with or arising out of the filing, rendition or
2
entry of the Permanent Injunction Order on this Stipulation for Entry of Permanent
3
Injunction, provided however, that no such waiver shall be deemed to exist insofar
4
as damages are concerned, it being agreed that Defendants may offer proof in
5
defense of Plaintiff’s claims for damages.9. WHEREAS the parties agree that the
6
permanent injunction shall remain in full force and effect through the final
7
disposition of this action and that any right to set aside the permanent injunction,
8
appeal therefrom or to otherwise attack its validity is hereby waived.
9
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants and its
10
agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, attorneys, representatives, successor
11
companies, related companies, and all persona acting in concert or participation
12
with it, and each of them, are, through the final disposition of this action,
13
PERMANENT ENJOINED from:
14
a.
The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction,
15
assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment,
16
distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing,
17
advertising or promotion of the counterfeit OTTERBOX® product identified in the
18
Complaint and any other unauthorized OTTERBOX® product (including any non-
19
genuine reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation thereof).
20
b.
The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction,
21
assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment,
22
distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing,
23
advertising or promotion of the infringing and diluting product identified in the
24
Complaint and any other product which infringes or dilutes any Plaintiff’s Mark,
25
trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, any of Plaintiff’s Marks
26
at issue in this action.
27
28
c.
The unauthorized use, in any manner whatsoever, of any Plaintiff’s
trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, the
-4PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
1
Plaintiff’s Marks at issue in this action, any variants, colorable imitations,
2
translations and/or simulations thereof and/or any items that are confusingly
3
similar thereto, including specifically:
4
i.
on or in conjunction with any product or service; and
5
ii.
on or in conjunction with any advertising, promotional
6
materials, labels, hangtags, packaging, or containers.
7
d.
The use of any trademark, trade name, or trade dress that falsely
8
represents, or is likely to confuse, mislead or deceive purchasers, customers, or
9
members of the public to believe that unauthorized product imported, exported,
10
manufactured, reproduced, distributed, assembled, acquired, purchased, offered,
11
sold, transferred, brokered, consigned, distributed, stored, shipped, marketed,
12
advertised and/or promoted by Defendants originates from Plaintiff, or that said
13
merchandise has been sponsored, approved, licensed by, or associated with
14
Plaintiff or is, in some way, connected or affiliated with Plaintiff.
15
e.
Engaging in any conduct that falsely represents that, or is likely to
16
confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, customers, or members of the public to
17
believe that Defendants themselves are connected with, or is in some way
18
sponsored by or affiliated with Plaintiff, purchases product from or otherwise has a
19
business relationship with Plaintiff.
20
f.
Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the
21
manufacture, distribution, advertising, sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of
22
any goods, a false description or representation, including words or symbols,
23
tending to falsely describe or represent such goods as being those of Plaintiff.
24
g.
Hiding, disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring
25
any and all products, advertising, promotional materials, labels, hangtags,
26
packaging or containers bearing any of Plaintiff’s Marks; and/or
27
28
h.
Disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring any
documents or things, including electronic records, pertaining to the purchase,
-5PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
1
procurement, development, making, manufacture, use, display, advertisement,
2
marketing, licensing, sale, offer for sale, distribution, shipping, or delivery of any
3
products or services bearing any Plaintiff’s Marks or which otherwise refer or
4
relate to Plaintiff or any of Plaintiff’s Marks.
5
6
7
10.
This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon
Defendants at the time of its execution by the Court.
11.
The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this
8
Permanent Injunction and, pursuant to Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
9
Procedure, the Court directs immediate entry of this Permanent Injunction against
10
11
Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
DATED: February 19, 2013
___________________________________
Hon. John F. Walter
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANTS EQUIPPED, LLC AND ARI CIMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?