Otter Products LLC v. MPL Deals Inc et al
Filing
16
DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION for plaintiff and against defendants MPL Deals Inc, Menachem Prus by Judge Otis D Wright, II. .RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT.(MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc) Modified on 9/21/2012 (lc). Modified on 9/21/2012 (lc).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698
E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com
Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227
E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com
Ani S. Garibyan, SBN: 274846
E-mail: agaribyan@johnsonpham.com
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: (818) 888-7540
Facsimile: (818) 888-7544
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC
JS-6
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
Case No.: CV12-04206 ODW (MANx)
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado
Limited Liability Company,
JUDGMENT
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
24
v.
MPL DEALS, INC., a New York
Corporation; MENACHEM PRUS, an
Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
27
Plaintiff, OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (“Plaintiff”), is hereby awarded final
28
judgment on its claims for relief against Defendants MPL DEALS, INC. and
-1-
1
MENACHEM PRUS (collectively, “Defendants”), in the sum of $400,000.00 (15
2
U.S.C. §1117 (c)(2)), as the prevailing party in this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b)
3
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local
4
Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees of $5,600.00. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
5
§1117(a), Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against said Defendants for recovery of
6
total costs Plaintiff has incurred in this action due to Defendants’ violation of 15
7
U.S.C. §1125(a), and willful violation of 15 U.S.C. §1125(c) in the amount of
8
$468.13.
9
Furthermore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants and their agents,
10
employees, officers, directors, owners, attorneys, representatives, successor
11
companies, related companies, and all persona acting in concert or participation
12
with him, and each of them, be permanently restrained from:
13
a.
The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly,
14
use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment,
15
distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing,
16
advertising or promotion of the counterfeit OTTERBOX® product identified in the
17
Complaint and any other unauthorized OTTERBOX® product, or products bearing
18
Plaintiff’s Trademarks (including any non-genuine reproduction, counterfeit, copy
19
or colorable imitation thereof).
20
b.
The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly,
21
use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment,
22
distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing,
23
advertising or promotion of the infringing and diluting product identified in the
24
Complaint and any other product which infringes or dilutes any Plaintiff’s
25
Trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, any of
26
Plaintiff’s Trademarks at issue in this action.
27
28
c.
The unauthorized use, in any manner whatsoever, of any Plaintiff’s
trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, the
-2-
1
Plaintiff’s Trademarks at issue in this action, any variants, colorable imitations,
2
translations and/or simulations thereof and/or any items that are confusingly
3
similar thereto, including specifically:
4
i.
on or in conjunction with any product or service; and
5
ii.
on or in conjunction with any advertising, promotional
6
materials, labels, hangtags, packaging, or containers.
7
d.
The use of any trademark, trade name, or trade dress that falsely
8
represents, or is likely to confuse, mislead or deceive purchasers, customers, or
9
members of the public to believe that unauthorized product imported, exported,
10
manufactured, reproduced, distributed, assembled, acquired, purchased, offered,
11
sold, transferred, brokered, consigned, distributed, stored, shipped, marketed,
12
advertised and/or promoted by Defendant originates from Plaintiff, or that said
13
merchandise has been sponsored, approved, licensed by, or associated with
14
Plaintiff or is, in some way, connected or affiliated with Plaintiff.
15
e.
Engaging in any conduct that falsely represents that, or is likely to
16
confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, customers, or members of the public to
17
believe that Defendant itself is connected with, or is in some way sponsored by or
18
affiliated with Plaintiff, purchases product from or otherwise has a business
19
relationship with Plaintiff.
20
f.
Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the
21
manufacture, distribution, advertising, sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of
22
any goods, a false description or representation, including words or symbols,
23
tending to falsely describe or represent such goods as being those of Plaintiff.
24
g.
Hiding, disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring
25
any and all products, advertising, promotional materials, labels, hangtags,
26
packaging or containers bearing any of Plaintiff’s Trademarks; and/or
27
28
h.
Disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring any
documents or things, including electronic records, pertaining to the purchase,
-3-
1
procurement, development, making, manufacture, use, display, advertisement,
2
marketing, licensing, sale, offer for sale, distribution, shipping, or delivery of any
3
products or services bearing any Plaintiff’s Trademarks or which otherwise refer or
4
relate to Plaintiff or any of Plaintiff’s Trademarks.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: September 21, 2012
By: ___________________________
Otis D. Wright
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?