Otter Products LLC v. MPL Deals Inc et al

Filing 16

DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION for plaintiff and against defendants MPL Deals Inc, Menachem Prus by Judge Otis D Wright, II. .RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT.(MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc) Modified on 9/21/2012 (lc). Modified on 9/21/2012 (lc).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698 E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697 E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227 E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com Ani S. Garibyan, SBN: 274846 E-mail: agaribyan@johnsonpham.com 6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 888-7540 Facsimile: (818) 888-7544 Attorneys for Plaintiff OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC JS-6 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 Case No.: CV12-04206 ODW (MANx) OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, JUDGMENT 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. MPL DEALS, INC., a New York Corporation; MENACHEM PRUS, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. 25 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 27 Plaintiff, OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (“Plaintiff”), is hereby awarded final 28 judgment on its claims for relief against Defendants MPL DEALS, INC. and -1- 1 MENACHEM PRUS (collectively, “Defendants”), in the sum of $400,000.00 (15 2 U.S.C. §1117 (c)(2)), as the prevailing party in this action, pursuant to Rule 55(b) 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local 4 Rule 55-3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees of $5,600.00. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 5 §1117(a), Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against said Defendants for recovery of 6 total costs Plaintiff has incurred in this action due to Defendants’ violation of 15 7 U.S.C. §1125(a), and willful violation of 15 U.S.C. §1125(c) in the amount of 8 $468.13. 9 Furthermore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants and their agents, 10 employees, officers, directors, owners, attorneys, representatives, successor 11 companies, related companies, and all persona acting in concert or participation 12 with him, and each of them, be permanently restrained from: 13 a. The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, 14 use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 15 distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing, 16 advertising or promotion of the counterfeit OTTERBOX® product identified in the 17 Complaint and any other unauthorized OTTERBOX® product, or products bearing 18 Plaintiff’s Trademarks (including any non-genuine reproduction, counterfeit, copy 19 or colorable imitation thereof). 20 b. The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, 21 use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 22 distribution, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing, 23 advertising or promotion of the infringing and diluting product identified in the 24 Complaint and any other product which infringes or dilutes any Plaintiff’s 25 Trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, any of 26 Plaintiff’s Trademarks at issue in this action. 27 28 c. The unauthorized use, in any manner whatsoever, of any Plaintiff’s trademark, trade name and/or trade dress including, but not limited to, the -2- 1 Plaintiff’s Trademarks at issue in this action, any variants, colorable imitations, 2 translations and/or simulations thereof and/or any items that are confusingly 3 similar thereto, including specifically: 4 i. on or in conjunction with any product or service; and 5 ii. on or in conjunction with any advertising, promotional 6 materials, labels, hangtags, packaging, or containers. 7 d. The use of any trademark, trade name, or trade dress that falsely 8 represents, or is likely to confuse, mislead or deceive purchasers, customers, or 9 members of the public to believe that unauthorized product imported, exported, 10 manufactured, reproduced, distributed, assembled, acquired, purchased, offered, 11 sold, transferred, brokered, consigned, distributed, stored, shipped, marketed, 12 advertised and/or promoted by Defendant originates from Plaintiff, or that said 13 merchandise has been sponsored, approved, licensed by, or associated with 14 Plaintiff or is, in some way, connected or affiliated with Plaintiff. 15 e. Engaging in any conduct that falsely represents that, or is likely to 16 confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, customers, or members of the public to 17 believe that Defendant itself is connected with, or is in some way sponsored by or 18 affiliated with Plaintiff, purchases product from or otherwise has a business 19 relationship with Plaintiff. 20 f. Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the 21 manufacture, distribution, advertising, sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of 22 any goods, a false description or representation, including words or symbols, 23 tending to falsely describe or represent such goods as being those of Plaintiff. 24 g. Hiding, disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring 25 any and all products, advertising, promotional materials, labels, hangtags, 26 packaging or containers bearing any of Plaintiff’s Trademarks; and/or 27 28 h. Disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring any documents or things, including electronic records, pertaining to the purchase, -3- 1 procurement, development, making, manufacture, use, display, advertisement, 2 marketing, licensing, sale, offer for sale, distribution, shipping, or delivery of any 3 products or services bearing any Plaintiff’s Trademarks or which otherwise refer or 4 relate to Plaintiff or any of Plaintiff’s Trademarks. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: September 21, 2012 By: ___________________________ Otis D. Wright United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?