United States of America v. Univoz Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 29 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
VALERIE L. MAKAREWICZ
Assistant United States Attorney
California Bar Number 229637
Federal Building, Suite 7211
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for United States of America

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNIVOZ, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

No. CV 12- 4437 FMO (RZx)
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE,
VACATE DATES SET BY COURT,
AND TO PLACE CASE ON
INACTIVE STATUS

Pursuant to the “STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF CASE, VACATE
DATES SET BY COURT, AND TO PLACE CASE ON INACTIVE STATUS”
filed by the parties, and for good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED:
1.

The parties have reached a settlement in this matter which has been
accepted by the Department of Justice, Tax Division.

2.

Defendants will be making monthly payments to plaintiff over a sixmonth period, with payment due on the 15th day of each month, but no
later than the 20th of each month. The first payment by defendants
will be due to plaintiff on June 15, 2013 and the last payment will be

-1-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

due on November 15, 2013 (excluding the 5-day grace period as
enumerated in the preceding sentence).
3.

Concurrently, the parties have executed a “Stipulation to Dismiss
Case Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)” and “Stipulation for
Entry of Judgment.”

4.

In the event that the terms of the settlement are fully complied with by
defendants by November 15, 2013 (or by November 20, 2013,
including the 5-day grace period enumerated in paragraph 2, above),
the parties will thereafter file the “Stipulation to Dismiss Case
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),” which will resolve the
entire case before the Court.

5.

In the event that the terms of the settlement are not fully complied
with and defendants breach the settlement agreement, the United
States of America will file the “Stipulation for Entry of Judgment”
which will resolve the entire case before the Court, along with a
proposed Order for the Court to enter the Judgment agreed to by the
parties in the “Stipulation for Entry of Judgment.”

///
///
///

-2-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

6.

The Court’s scheduling order filed on December 10, 2012 is hereby
vacated and this case is placed on inactive status with the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 20, 2013
______/s/_____________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Respectfully submitted,
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division

________________________________
VALERIE L. MAKAREWICZ
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for United States of America

-3-