United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Crane Financial and Insurance Agency Inc et al

Filing 76

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accor dingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than December 28, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendants' Answers to the First Amended Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendants; AND Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Damiano Kigoye. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 12-4614-RSWL (AGRx)

Title

United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Crane Financial and Insurance Agency Inc
et al

Present: The Honorable

Date

December 13, 2012

RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

Joseph Remigio
Deputy Clerk

n/a
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action
diligently. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any
defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule
7-1.
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected
below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing
no later than December 28, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept the following, if it is
filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.
•

Defendants’ Answers to the First Amended Complaint or Plaintiff’s Request for
Entry of Default on defendants;
AND

•

Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Damiano Kigoye.

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand
submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a
response by plaintiff(s) is due.
Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all remaining named parties in this action, if any.
:
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

00

JRE

Page 1 of 1