Anthony L Tarkington v. William Smith et al

Filing 34

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. It is Adjudged that the Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend as against both Defendant Sanchez and Defendant Smith: (a) with prejudice to the extent the Complaint challenges Defendants' alleged actions or inactions with regard to Plaintiff's postconviction requests for DNA testing; and (b) without prejudice as to Plaintiff's claims challenging the validity of his conviction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ANTHONY L. TARKINGTON,

) NO. CV 12-4849-JAK(E)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
JUDGMENT
)
WILLIAM SMITH JR., DEPUTY
)
DISTRICT ATTORNEY; MARY
)
SANCHEZ, DEPUTY ATTORNEY
)
GENERAL,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________)

18
19

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Complaint is dismissed without leave to

20

amend as against both Defendant Sanchez and Defendant Smith:

21

prejudice to the extent the Complaint challenges Defendants’ alleged

22

actions or inactions with regard to Plaintiff’s postconviction

23

requests for DNA testing; and (b) without prejudice as to Plaintiff’s

24

claims challenging the validity of his conviction.

25
26
27
28

DATED: May 8, 2013
_____________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

(a) with