Michael Dapello v. City of Long Beach

Filing 22

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: The Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference, is approved. The Court reserves jurisdiction with respect to this consolidated action for the purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement; and this consolidated action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mg)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN

11
12

MICHAEL DAPELLO,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
CITY OF LONG BEACH,

18

JUDGMENT RE: APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Defendant.

16
17

Case No.: CV 12-05065-GW(PLAx)

AND ALL CONSOLIDATED
ACTIONS

19
20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

21

1.

The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ concurrently-filed

22

Stipulation Re Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice

23

(“Stipulation”) and the settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) attached as

24

Exhibit “A” to the Stipulation in Joe Battle v. City of Long Beach, CV 12-5055-

25

GW(PLAx);

26
27

2.

The Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference,

is approved as fair, reasonable and just in all aspects to Plaintiffs Joe Battle,

28
PROPOSED JUDGMENT RE APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

1

Anthony Lembi, Steve Lowe, Richard Birdsall, Alberto Vargas, John Lembi,

2

Robert Schroeder, Ross Smillie and Michael Dapello (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)

3

and the parties shall perform the Settlement Agreement in accordance with its

4

terms;

5
6
7
8

3.

The Court reserves jurisdiction with respect to this consolidated action

for the purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement; and
4.

This consolidated action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with

prejudice.

9
10
11

DATED: June 5, 2014

____________________________________
HON. GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
PROPOSED JUDGMENT RE APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE