Hilda L Solis v. Isamel C Covarrubias et al

Filing 4

CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson in favor of Hilda L Solis against defendants Frederick Mendez, Ismael C Covarrubias, Jr. The Defendants, their officers,agents, servants, and employees and those persons in active concert or participation w iththem who receive actual notice of this order (by personal service or otherwise) be, and they hereby are, permanently enjoined and restrained re violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendants, jointly and severally, shall not continue to wit hhold the payment of $348,242.63 in minimum wage and overtime pay hereby found to be due under theFLSA to 29 employees, as a result of their employment by defendants during the period of October 26, 2009 through December 17, 2011.Defendants shall pay the backwages, plus 1% annual interest on the outstanding balance starting from May 24, 2012 until the backwages required under this Judgmentare paid in full.each party shall bear its own fees. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)

Download PDF
6 Mary K. Alejandro Acting Regional Solicitor Daniel J. Chasek, (CSBN #186968) Associate Regional Solicitor Office of the Solicitor (Sol#1219779) United States Department of Labor 350 So. Figueroa St., Suite 370 Los Angeles, California 90071-1202 Telephone: (213) 894-4225 Facsimile: (213) 894-2064 chasek.daniel@dol.gov 7 Attorneys for the Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 JS-6 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, ) Case No. 2:12-cv-05154-DDP-SP ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT v. ) ) Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr., DBA King Con- ) struction; Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr., Indi- ) vidually and as Managing Agent of Ismael C. ) Covarrubias, Jr., DBA King Construction; ) Frederick Mendez, Individually and as Man- ) aging Agent of Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr. DBA ) King Construction, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 22 23 Plaintiff Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor 24 (“Secretary”) and defendants Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr., DBA King Construction (“King 25 Construction”), Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr., individually and as managing agent of Ismael 26 C. Covarrubias, Jr., DBA King Construction, and Frederick Mendez, individually and as 27 managing agent of Ismael C. Covarrubias, Jr., DBA King Construction (collectively, 28 “Defendants”), have agreed to resolve the matters in controversy in this civil action and Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 1 of 9 1 2 consent to the entry of this Consent Judgment in accordance herewith: A. The Secretary has filed a Complaint alleging that Defendants violated pro- 3 visions of Sections 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as 4 amended (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 215(a)(2) and 215(a)(5). 5 B. Defendants have appeared and (after having been advised by Plaintiff of the 6 right to retain the assistance of defense counsel) acknowledge receipt of a copy of the 7 Secretary’s Complaint. 8 9 10 C. Defendants waive issuance and service of process and waive answer and any defenses to the Secretary’s Complaint. D. The Secretary and Defendants waive Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 11 Law, and agree to the entry of this Consent Judgment in settlement of this action, with- 12 out further contest. 13 14 15 16 E. Defendants admit that the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this civil action and that venue lies in the Central District of California. It is therefore, upon motion of the attorneys for the Secretary, and for cause shown, 17 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendants, their officers, 18 agents, servants, and employees and those persons in active concert or participation with 19 them who receive actual notice of this order (by personal service or otherwise) be, and 20 they hereby are, permanently enjoined and restrained from violating the provisions of 21 Sections 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 215(a)(2) and 215(a)(5), in 22 any of the following manners: 23 1. Defendants shall not, contrary to FLSA § 6, 29 U.S.C. § 206, pay any employ- 24 ee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or the production of goods for com- 25 merce, within the meaning of the FLSA, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in 26 commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of FLSA 27 § 3(s), wages at a rate less than $7.25 an hour (or less than the applicable minimum rate 28 as may hereafter be established by amendment to the FLSA). Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 2 of 9 1 2. Defendants shall not, contrary to FLSA § 7, 29 U.S.C. § 207, employ any em- 2 ployee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for 3 commerce, within the meaning of the FLSA, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in 4 commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of FLSA 5 § 3(s), for any workweek longer than 40 hours unless such employee receives compensa- 6 tion for his or her employment in excess of 40 hours in such workweek at a rate not less 7 than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he or she is employed. 8 3. Defendants shall not fail to make, keep, make available to authorized agents of 9 the Secretary for inspection, transcription, and/or copying, upon their demand for such 10 access, and preserve records of employees and of the wages, hours, and other conditions 11 and practices of employment maintained, as prescribed by regulations issued, and from 12 time to time amended, pursuant to FLSA §§ 11(c) and 15(a)(5), 29 U.S.C. §§ 211(c) and 13 215(a)(5) and the implementing regulations found in Title 29, Code of Federal Regula- 14 tions, Part 516. 15 4. Defendants, jointly and severally, shall not continue to withhold the payment 16 of $348,242.63 in minimum wage and overtime pay hereby found to be due under the 17 FLSA to 29 employees, as a result of their employment by defendants during the period 18 of October 26, 2009 through December 17, 2011 as set forth in the attached Exhibit 1, 19 showing the name of each employee and listing on the same line the gross backwage 20 amount due the employee and the period covered by the Consent Judgment. 21 5. Defendants shall pay the backwages, plus 1% annual interest on the outstand- 22 ing balance starting from May 24, 2012 until the backwages required under this Judg- 23 ment are paid in full, as set forth in paragraph 6 below (and as set forth in attached Ex- 24 hibit 2). Each payment shall be made by a certified or cashier’s check or money order 25 with the firm name and “BWs + Interest” written on each, payable to the order of the 26 “Wage & Hour Div., Labor,” and delivered to the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and 27 Hour Division, 100 N. Barranca Ave. Suite 850, West Covina, CA, 91791, on or before 28 the date the payment is due. Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 3 of 9 1 6. Defendants shall deliver to the Wage and Hour Division, United States De- 2 partment of Labor, 100 N. Barranca Ave. Suite 850, West Covina, CA, 91791, the fol- 3 lowing: 4 a. On or before May 24, 2012, a schedule in duplicate bearing the firm 5 name, employer identification number(s), address, and phone number of the de- 6 fendants and showing the name, last known (home) address, social security num- 7 ber, and gross backwage amount for each person listed in the attached Exhibit 1; 8 b. On or before May 24, 2012, a certified or cashier's check or money order 9 with the firm name and “BWs + Interest” written on each, payable to the order of 10 the “Wage & Hour Div., Labor,” in the amount of $15,000; 11 c. On or before June 24, 2012, and again on or before the 24th day of each 12 of the 23 months thereafter, a certified or cashier's check or money order with the 13 firm name and “BWs + Interest” written on each, payable to the order of the 14 “Wage & Hour Div., Labor,” in the amounts reflected on Exhibit 2; 15 d. In the event of a default in the timely making of any of the payments 16 specified herein, the full amount under the backwage provisions of this Judgment 17 which then remains unpaid, plus interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per year, 18 from the date of this Judgment until the full amount of this Judgment is paid in 19 full, shall become due and payable upon the Secretary’s sending by ordinary mail 20 a written demand to the last business address of the Defendants then known to the 21 Secretary; 22 e. There will be no pre-payment penalty in the event the Defendants pay 23 the full amounts due under the monetary provisions of this Judgment prior to the 24 dates set forth above. 25 7. The Secretary shall allocate and distribute the remittances, or the proceeds 26 thereof, to the persons named in the attached Exhibit 1, or to their estates if that be nec- 27 essary, in her sole discretion, and any money not so paid within a period of three years 28 from the date of its receipt, because of an inability to locate the proper persons or be- Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 4 of 9 1 cause of their refusal to accept it, shall be then deposited in the Treasury of the United 2 States, as miscellaneous receipts, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(c); and, it is further 3 ORDERED that the filing, pursuit, and/or resolution of this proceeding with the 4 entry of this Judgment shall not act as or be asserted as a bar to any action under FLSA 5 § 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), as to any employee not named on the attached Exhibit 1 nor 6 as to any employee named on the attached Exhibit 1 for any period not specified therein; 7 and, it is further 8 ORDERED that each party shall bear its own fees and other expenses incurred by 9 such party in connection with any stage of this proceeding, including but not limited to 10 attorneys' fees, which may be available under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as 11 amended; and, it is further 12 13 ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Judgment. 14 15 Dated: June 21, 2012 16 17 18 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 6 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 7 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Period MI Begin Date Last Name First Name AREVALO BARRAGAN BARRAJAS BARRAJAS BARRAJAS BOLANOS CARNELAS CARRILLO CARRILLO SAMUEL OSCAR DANIEL JORGE LUIS OSCAR JORGE JOSE PRUDENSIO RAFAEL JOSE ALCALA PEDRO M PEDRO P ARMANDO PEDRO RAMON AMADOR ENRIQUE GREGORIO JOAQUIN ANTONIO MARTINEZ ALFONSO CARMELO PEDRO LAURIANO SERGIO JOSE ALEX JESUS EDGAR ENRIQUE CARVAJAL CASTANEDA CASTANEDA CONTRERAS HERIBERT HERNANDEZ LLAMAS LLAMAS LOPEZ MARAVILLA MEJIA MENDOZA MENDOZA MORALES RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ TRUJILLO VERDUZCO ZEPEDA ZEPEDA Period End Date Gross Back Wages Due 10/26/2009 10/26/2009 10/26/2009 11/07/2011 10/26/2009 10/26/2009 04/04/2011 10/30/2011 10/26/2009 04/25/2010 $1,923.50 09/25/2011 $23,641.50 12/18/2011 $33,319.25 11/20/2011 $1,650.00 10/10/2010 $8,227.50 01/24/2010 $1,327.50 10/23/2011 $10,207.00 11/13/2011 $8,463.75 10/10/2010 $8,019.00 10/26/2009 04/04/2011 02/06/2011 04/03/2011 10/30/2010 10/26/2009 09/27/2010 05/30/2010 10/26/2009 06/05/2011 11/27/2011 11/20/2011 12/04/2011 12/17/2011 10/23/2011 11/13/2011 11/27/2011 05/01/2011 10/09/2011 10/23/2011 10/23/2011 05/08/2011 10/26/2009 10/16/2011 10/26/2009 10/26/2009 09/12/2010 12/04/2011 $4,230.00 11/13/2011 $1,377.50 11/27/2011 $29,716.00 10/30/2011 $870.00 11/27/2011 $12,359.00 11/27/2011 $14,975.25 11/27/2011 $9,917.38 $31,365.50 $3,356.75 $12,432.00 $14,275.00 $11,399.50 $17,920.75 $14,772.50 $24,650.00 $24,548.50 $4,366.00 10/09/2011 10/23/2011 $580.00 10/26/2009 10/10/2010 $13,832.00 10/26/2009 10/10/2010 $4,520.00 26 27 28 Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT 2 1 Initial Payment due 5/24/2012 $ 15,000.00 4 Payment No. Date Due Total Due 5 1 06/24/2012 $28,914.85 6 2 07/24/2012 $28,935.85 7 3 08/24/2012 $28,911.85 8 4 09/24/2012 $28,984.61 9 5 10/24/2012 $10,899.00 10 6 11/24/2012 $11,038.51 11 7 12/24/2012 $10,905.62 12 8 01/24/2013 $10,896.56 13 9 02/24/2013 $10,999.80 14 10 03/24/2013 $10,993.89 15 11 04/24/2013 $10,892.13 16 12 05/24/2013 $11,021.38 17 13 06/24/2013 $11,201.53 18 14 07/24/2013 $10,900.76 19 15 08/24/2013 $10,891.69 20 16 09/24/2013 $11,211.82 21 17 10/24/2013 $10,894.12 22 18 11/24/2013 $11,056.05 23 19 12/24/2013 $11,082.33 24 20 01/24/2014 $11,124.70 25 21 02/24/2014 $11,068.22 26 22 03/24/2014 $10,950.58 27 23 04/24/2014 $11,101.73 28 24 05/24/2014 $11,085.54 2 3 Consent Judgment (Sol#1219779)) Page 9 of 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?