National Tax Service Inc v. Coast 2 Coast Tax Relief Inc

Filing 17

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King: Pursuant to the Court's January 8, 2013 Order 16 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff National Tax Service, Inc. ("Plaintiff") against De fendant Coast 2 Coast Tax Relief, Inc. ("Defendant") in the following amount: $50,000 in statutory damages for Plaintiff's cybersquatting claim. Pursuant to the Court's January 8, 2013 Order, Defendant is permanently enjoine d as follows: Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice by personal service or otherwise, are permanently enjoined. Also pursuant to the Courts January 8, 2013 Order, Defendant'sCoast2CoastTax.com domain name registration shall be transferred to plaintiff under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(C). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)

Download PDF
1 2 3 FILED: 1/08/2013 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Coast 2 Coast Tax Relief, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) National Tax Service, Inc., CASE NO. CV 12-5396-GHK (PLAx) JUDGMENT 16 17 Pursuant to the Court’s January 8, 2013 Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 18 AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff National 19 Tax Service, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant Coast 2 Coast Tax Relief, Inc. 20 (“Defendant”) in the following amount: $50,000 in statutory damages for Plaintiff’s 21 cybersquatting claim. 22 Pursuant to the Court’s January 8, 2013 Order, Defendant is permanently enjoined 23 as follows: Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all 24 persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice by 25 personal service or otherwise, are permanently enjoined from: (1) using in commerce the 26 trademark or trade name COAST 2 COAST or any confusingly similar variant thereof; 27 (2) infringing plaintiff’s trademarks; and (3) conspiring, encouraging, inducing, allowing, 28 abetting, or assisting others in infringing plaintiff’s trademarks. 1 Also pursuant to the Court’s January 8, 2013 Order, Defendant’s 2 Coast2CoastTax.com domain name registration shall be transferred to plaintiff under 15 3 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(C).1 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: January 8, 2013 _______________________________ GEORGE H. KING Chief United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(C) provides as follows: “In any civil action involving the registration, trafficking, or use of a domain name under [§ 1125(d)], a court may order . . . the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark.” 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?