Elise Brown v. Debra Bowen
Filing
35
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Secretary of State and Interveners shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing and that the Secretary of State and Interveners shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELISE BROWN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
CV 12-5547 PA (SPx)
JUDGMENT
v.
DEBRA BOWEN,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Pursuant to the Court’s October 9, 2012 Minute Order granting the Motions to
18
Dismiss filed by defendants Debra Bowen (“Secretary of State”) and intervener-defendants
19
Independent Voter Project, Californians to Defend the Open Primary, Abel Maldonado, and
20
David Takashima (collectively “Interveners”), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by
21
plaintiff Elise Brown (“Plaintiff”),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Secretary of
22
23
State and Interveners shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiff.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims
24
25
are dismissed with prejudice.
26
....
27
....
28
....
1
2
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take
nothing and that the Secretary of State and Interveners shall have their costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 9, 2012
_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?