George L Tapanes v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The above captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 15 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff George L. Tapanes 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 11 GEORGE L. TAPANES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 ) Case No.: 12-cv-05780- MRW ) ) /PROPOSED/ ORDER OF ) DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The above captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: December 14, 2012 /s/ Judge Wilner ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. WILNER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: December 10, 2012 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Steven G. Rosales BY: __________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff George L. Tapanes 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 12-CV-05780-SVW-MRW I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on December 10, 2012. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Steven G. Rosales _______________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?