George L Tapanes v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The above captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 15 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Steven G. Rosales
Attorney at Law: 222224
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
George L. Tapanes
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
8
9
10
11
GEORGE L. TAPANES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
) Case No.: 12-cv-05780- MRW
)
) /PROPOSED/ ORDER OF
) DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The above captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to
bear its own fees, costs, and expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE:
December 14, 2012
/s/ Judge Wilner
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. WILNER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-1-
1
2
3
4
DATE: December 10, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
/s/ Steven G. Rosales
BY: __________________
Steven G. Rosales
Attorney for plaintiff George L. Tapanes
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
FOR CASE NUMBER 12-CV-05780-SVW-MRW
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on December 10, 2012.
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Steven G. Rosales
_______________________________
Steven G. Rosales
Attorneys for Plaintiff
___________
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?