Mary Pickford Foundation v. Timeline Films LLC et al

Filing 49

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 48 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (a) Plaintiff Mary Pickford Foundations complaint and its claims in this case are dismissed with prejudice; (a) Countercl aimant Timeline Films, LLC counterclaim and its claims in this case are dismissed with prejudice; (b) The parties shall comply with the terms of their Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases entered into on August 25, 2013; (c) Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs; and (d) This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties August 25, 2013 Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lw)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Terrence Mazura (Bar No. 101075)
[e-mail]
Mazura Law Firm
414 West Fourth Street, Suite A
Santa Ana, California 92701
Tel: [phone] Fax : [phone]
Attorneys for the Plaintiff

E-FILED 10/15/13
JS-6

Robert A. Aronson SBN 123687
[e-mail]
9401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 830
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2944
Telephone: [phone]
Attorney for Defendants and
Counterclaimant

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

MARY PICKFORD FOUNDATION,
a California non-profit corporation,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

MAZURA LAW FIRM

17
18
19
20

CASE NO. CV12-06070 PSG (DTBx)
[Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

v.
TIMELINE FILMS, LLC, a limited
liability company; HUGH NEELY,
Defendants.
TIMELINE FILMS, LLC,
Counterclaimant,
v.
MARY PICKFORD FOUNDATION,
etc., et al.,
Counter-defendants
ORDER re Dismissal With Prejudice

Page - 1

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice among all of

1
2

the partiers to this action this case has been settled and all issues and

3

controversies have been resolved.

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

(a)

6
7
8
9
10

Plaintiff Mary Pickford Foundation’s complaint and its claims in this

case are dismissed with prejudice;
(a)

Counterclaimant Timeline Films, LLC counterclaim and its claims in

this case are dismissed with prejudice;
(b)

The parties shall comply with the terms of their Settlement

Agreement and Mutual General Releases entered into on August 25, 2013;

11

(c)

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and

12

(d)

This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties

13

August 25, 2013 Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases under the

14

authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-

15

82 (1994).

16

MAZURA LAW FIRM

17

DATED: 10/15/13
___________________________________
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Court Judge

18
19
20

ORDER re Dismissal With Prejudice

Page - 2