Serge Kraif v. Hubert Guez

Filing 112

JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS FEES by Judge S. James Otero: Judgment entered in favor of Defendant Hubert Guez for the amount of $148,668.40, which represents the attorneys fees that were reasonable and necessary to Hubert Guezs successful defense of Plaintiff Serge Kraifs second claim for relief alleged in this action for fraud and deceit, plus interest to accrue thereon at the legal rate from the date of the Clerks entry of this Judgment until the full satisfaction of this Judgment. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SERGE KRAIF, CASE NO. 2:12-cv-06206-SJO(SH) 12 [Hon. S. James Otero] 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 HUBERT GUEZ, ` 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES Complaint Filed: July 18, 2012 Dismissal Entered: Oct. 15, 2013 Appeal Filed: November 14, 2013 Mandate Issued: June 30, 2014 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP -1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES 1 Pursuant to the Court’s August 26, 2014 Order granting in part Defendant 2 Hubert Guez’s Renewed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to California Code of 3 Civil Procedure section 1021 (ECF No. 110), and good cause appearing therefor: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT 5 JUDGMENT IS TO BE ENTERED in favor of Defendant Hubert Guez for the 6 amount of $148,668.40, which represents the attorneys’ fees that were reasonable and 7 necessary to Hubert Guez’s successful defense of Plaintiff Serge Kraif’s second claim 8 for relief alleged in this action for fraud and deceit, plus interest to accrue thereon at 9 the legal rate from the date of the Clerk’s entry of this Judgment until the full 10 satisfaction of this Judgment. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 12 13 DATED: 9/21/14 By ___________________________________________ Honorable S. James Otero 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP -2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?