Serge Kraif v. Hubert Guez
Filing
112
JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS FEES by Judge S. James Otero: Judgment entered in favor of Defendant Hubert Guez for the amount of $148,668.40, which represents the attorneys fees that were reasonable and necessary to Hubert Guezs successful defense of Plaintiff Serge Kraifs second claim for relief alleged in this action for fraud and deceit, plus interest to accrue thereon at the legal rate from the date of the Clerks entry of this Judgment until the full satisfaction of this Judgment. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 SERGE KRAIF,
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-06206-SJO(SH)
12
[Hon. S. James Otero]
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 HUBERT GUEZ,
`
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’
FEES
Complaint Filed: July 18, 2012
Dismissal Entered: Oct. 15, 2013
Appeal Filed: November 14, 2013
Mandate Issued: June 30, 2014
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DICKSTEIN
SHAPIRO LLP
-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES
1
Pursuant to the Court’s August 26, 2014 Order granting in part Defendant
2 Hubert Guez’s Renewed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to California Code of
3 Civil Procedure section 1021 (ECF No. 110), and good cause appearing therefor:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT
5 JUDGMENT IS TO BE ENTERED in favor of Defendant Hubert Guez for the
6 amount of $148,668.40, which represents the attorneys’ fees that were reasonable and
7 necessary to Hubert Guez’s successful defense of Plaintiff Serge Kraif’s second claim
8 for relief alleged in this action for fraud and deceit, plus interest to accrue thereon at
9 the legal rate from the date of the Clerk’s entry of this Judgment until the full
10 satisfaction of this Judgment.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
12
13 DATED: 9/21/14
By ___________________________________________
Honorable S. James Otero
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DICKSTEIN
SHAPIRO LLP
-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?