Jose Guajardo v. P D Brazeton
Filing
28
ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation 26 . (rla)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
JOSE GUAJARDO,
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
Case No. CV 12-06207 JFW (AN)
ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
P. D. BRAZETON, Warden,
16
Respondent.
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the file, including the
19
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") and Petitioner's Objections
20
(erroneously titled "Traverse") [27]. Further, the Court has completed a de novo review
21
of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected.
22
IT IS ORDERED that:
23
1.
The Objections, to the extent they reiterate arguments made in the Petition,
24
are overruled for the reasons set forth in the R&R. The Objections are also overruled
25
to the extent they make perfunctory references to additional claims without any specific
26
facts. See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74, 76 n.7, 97 S. Ct. 1621 (1977)
27
("[C]onclusory allegations unsupported by specifics [are] subject to summary
28
dismissal, as are contentions that in the face of the record are wholly incredible," and
1 a federal habeas petition "is expected to state facts that point to a real possibility of
2
constitutional error") (internal quotation marks omitted).
3
2.
The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the R&R.
4
3.
Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action
5 with prejudice.
6
4.
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall serve a copy ofthis
8
All pending motions are denied as moot and terminated.
Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 6, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?