Diane Ballou v. Los Angeles Police Department et al

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 17 . The parties must have met and conferred no later than yesterday (December 17) to prepare a joint Rule 26(f), which must be filed no later than Monday, December 24, 2012. (See ECF No. 1 4.) Failure to file a joint Rule 26(f) report on or before December 24 will result in dismissal of this action.The January 7, 2012 scheduling conference, however, is hereby VACATED,and no appearances are necessary. The Court will set a case-management schedule in this matter on the basis of the parties 26(f) report by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 12/18/2012 (lc).

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIANE BALLOU, 12 13 14 v. Case No. 2:12-cv-06324-ODW(JCGx) Plaintiff, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT et al, ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [17] Defendants. 15 16 17 The parties’ joint stipulation to continue the scheduling-conference date in this 18 matter is DENIED. The parties must have met and conferred no later than yesterday 19 (December 17) to prepare a joint Rule 26(f), which must be filed no later than 20 Monday, December 24, 2012. (See ECF No. 14.) Failure to file a joint Rule 26(f) 21 report on or before December 24 will result in dismissal of this action. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The January 7, 2012 scheduling conference, however, is hereby VACATED, 2 and no appearances are necessary. The Court will set a case-management schedule in 3 this matter on the basis of the parties’ 26(f) report. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 December 18, 2012 8 9 10 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?