Emily Wakeling v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 23

ORDER re DISMISSAL by Judge Gary A. Feess, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 22 . Having reviewed the Stipulation Re Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 entered by and between plaintiff Emily Wakeling and defendant Starbucks Corpo ration, and finding good cause therein, the Court hereby orders as follows: (i) plaintiffs individual claims against Starbucks are dismissed with prejudice, (ii) the putative class claims against Starbucks are dismissed without prejudice, and (iii) each side to bear her or its own attorneys' fees and costs to achieve said dismissal. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN 237615)
MARK R. CURIEL (SBN 222749)
GALIT A. KNOTZ (SBN 252962)
JONATHAN P. SLOWIK (SBN 287635)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-229-1001

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant
Starbucks Corporation

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

EMILY WAKELING, individually,
and on behalf of other persons
similarly situated,

15
16
17
18

Case No. 2:12-cv-06541-GAF-PJW
[Hon. Gary A. Feess]
ORDER RE DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs,
vs.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION; and
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

[Stipulation Re Dismissal filed
concurrently]

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RE DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:12-cv-06541-GAF-PJW
105074698

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Having reviewed the Stipulation Re Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41 entered by and between plaintiff Emily Wakeling and defendant Starbucks
Corporation, and finding good cause therein, the Court hereby orders as follows: (i)
plaintiff’s individual claims against Starbucks are dismissed with prejudice, (ii) the
putative class claims against Starbucks are dismissed without prejudice, and (iii) each
side to bear her or its own attorneys’ fees and costs to achieve said dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: September 20, 2013

By

10

Gary A. Feess
United States District Court Judge

11

JS-6

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:12-cv-06541-GAF-PJW
105074698