Celine Tran v. Shad Gregory Moss et al

Filing 56

ORDER AND JUDGMENTPURSUANT TO STIPULATION 53 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. 1) Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant: a. The sum of $51,666.67 on Plaintiff's Complaint, subject to the terms of the Stipu lation; b. The sum of $13,918.00 in reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Judgment; and c. Any future reasonable attorney fees and costs that may be fu rther incurred in connection with the enforcement of the Court's Judgment. 2. No Appeals and Continuing Jurisdiction. No appeals shall be taken from this Judgment, and all parties waive all rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any violation of the terms of this Judgment. All pending dates are vacated. The Clerk shall close this action. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jre)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 David Albert Pierce, Esq. [SBN 162396] Vera Golosker, Esq. [SBN 290537] PIERCE LAW GROUP LLP 9100 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 225 East Tower Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 274-9191 Facsimile: (310) 274-9151 David@PierceLLP.com Vera@PierceLLP.com JS-6 8 9 11 9100 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 225 East Tower Beverly Hills, California 90212 PIERCE LAW GROUP LLP 10 Attorney for Plaintiff CELINE TRAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 CELINE TRAN, an individual, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. Case No. 2:12-cv-06551-RSWL-FMOx ORDER AND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 17 18 19 20 21 SHAD GREGORY MOSS, an individual; UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 22 Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew Courtroom TBD Complaint Filed: October 31, 2012 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 2:16-cv-01214-RSWL-Ex -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 9100 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 225 East Tower Beverly Hills, California 90212 PIERCE LAW GROUP LLP 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation”), between Plaintiff Celine Tran (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand and Defendant Shad Gregory Moss (“Defendant”) on the other and attached hereto as Exhibit A, hereby orders that the Stipulation executed between Plaintiff and Defendant be deemed the actual judgment entered by the Court in the abovecaptioned matter: 1. Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant: a. The sum of $51,666.67 on Plaintiff’s Complaint, subject to the terms of the Stipulation; b. The sum of $13,918.00 in reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Judgment; and c. Any future reasonable attorney fees and costs that may be further incurred in connection with the enforcement of the Court’s Judgment. 2. No Appeals and Continuing Jurisdiction. No appeals shall be taken from this Judgment, and all parties waive all rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any violation of the terms of this Judgment. All pending dates are vacated. The Clerk shall close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 Dated : May 22, 2017 s/ RONALD S.W. LEW _____________________________ Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew Senior U.S. District Judge 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 2:16-cv-01214-RSWL-Ex -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?