Coach Inc et al v. Melrose Beauty Center et al
Filing
19
ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez in favor of Coach Inc, Coach Services Inc against Melrose Beauty Center, Bahareh Mahram Related to: Stipula tion for Judgment 18 : WHEREAS Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. ("Plaintiffs" or "Coach") and Defendants Beauty Solutions, Inc. dba Melrose Beauty Center and Bahareh Mahram ("Defendants") have entered int o a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the claims in the above reference matter. Defendants, having agreed to consent to the terms below terms, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the parties hereto that: (see document for further details). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (bm)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Brent H. Blakely (SBN 157292)
bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com
Michael Marchand (SBN 281080)
mmarchand@blakelylawgroup.com
BLAKELY LAW GROUP
915 North Citrus Avenue
Hollywood, California 90038
Telephone: (323) 464-7400
Facsimile: (323) 464-7410
E-FILED: 05-28-2013
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
19
COACH, INC., a Maryland Corporation; ) CASE NO. CV 12-06792 PSG (RZx)
COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland )
Corporation,
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT
Plaintiffs,
) JUDGMENT INCLUDING A
vs.
) PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
) VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION
MELROSE BEAUTY CENTER, an
) WITH PREJUDICE
unknown business entity; BAHAREH
)
MAHRAM, an individual, and DOES 1- )
10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
20
WHEREAS Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (“
Plaintiffs”or
21
“
Coach” and Defendants Beauty Solutions, Inc. dba Melrose Beauty Center and
)
22
Bahareh Mahram (“
Defendants” have entered into a Settlement Agreement and
)
23
Mutual Release as to the claims in the above reference matter. Defendants, having
24
agreed to consent to the terms below terms, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
25
and DECREED as among the parties hereto that:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
26
27
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Final Judgment and has
jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1338.
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
1
2.
Coach is the worldwide owner of the trademark “
COACH”and various
2
composite trademarks and assorted design components (collectively “
Coach Marks”
).
3
Coach Marks include but are not limited to the following marks:
4
5
Mark
6
U.S. Registration No(s). Registration Date
“
COACH”
751, 493
06/25/1963
7
1,071,000
08/09/1977
8
2,088,706
08/19/1997
9
3,157,972
10/17/2006
10
3,413,536
04/15/2008
3,251,315
06/12/2007
3,441,671
06/03/2008
17
2,252,847
06/15/1999
18
2,534,429
01/29/2002
1,309,779
12/18/1984
2,045,676
03/18/1997
2,169,808
06/30/1998
2,592,963
07/09/2002
2,626,565
09/24/2002
2,822,318
03/16/2004
2,832,589
04/13/2004
2,822,629
03/16/2004
3,695,290
10/13/2009
11
12
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Signature “ Logo
C”
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
1
3,696,470
10/13/2009
3,012,585
11/08/2005
2
3
4
Coach “ Art”Mark
Op
5
6
7
8
9
10
3.
Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants’purchase and sale of products
11
which infringe upon the Coach Marks constitutes trademark counterfeiting, trademark
12
infringement, trade dress infringement, false designations of origin and false
13
descriptions, federal trademark dilution, trademark dilution under California law, and
14
unfair competition under California law. Without admitting to liability, Defendants
15
have agreed to all terms set forth herein.
16
4.
Defendants and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active
17
concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment
18
are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach
19
Marks, either directly or contributorily, in any manner, including but not limited to:
20
(a)
Manufacturing, importing, purchasing, distributing, advertising,
21
offering for sale, and/or selling any products which bear designs identical, substantially
22
similar, and/or confusingly similar to the Coach Marks;
23
(b)
Using the Coach Marks or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or
24
colorable imitation thereof in connection with the manufacture, importation,
25
distribution, advertisement, offer for sale and/or sale of merchandise;
26
(c)
Passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any
27
products or other items that are not Plaintiffs’genuine merchandise as genuine Coach
28
merchandise;
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
1
2
(d)
Committing any other acts calculated to cause purchasers to believe
that Defendants’products are Coach’ genuine merchandise unless they are such;
s
3
(e)
Shipping, delivering, holding for sale, distributing, returning,
4
transferring or otherwise moving, storing or disposing of in any manner items falsely
5
bearing the Coach Marks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation
6
thereof; and
7
(f)
Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or
8
entity in performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs 4(a) to
9
4(g) above.
10
11
5.
Plaintiffs and Defendants shall bear their own costs associated with this
action.
12
6.
The execution of this Final Judgment shall serve to bind and obligate the
13
parties hereto.
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
1
7.
The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any
2
further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Final
3
Judgment, the enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof.
4
Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED
8
9
DATED:
_____________, 2013
May 24
____________________________
Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez
10
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?