Christopher Oji Darkins v. Janet Napolitano
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Re DISMISSAL OF ACTION 8 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 8 . Plaintiff has yet to file any proof of service; thus, this Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs complaint WIHTOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with this Courts May 13, 2013 Order. See Local Rule 83-7. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
2:12-cv-6845-SVW-SH
Date
Title
July 17, 2013
Christopher Oji Darkins v. Janet Napolitano
JS-6
Present: The Honorable
STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
IN CHAMBERS ORDER Re DISMISSAL OF ACTION [8]
On August 9, 2012, this Court denied Plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order and
ordered Defendant to serve Defendant Napolitano within 120 days. On April 24, 2013, this Court issued
an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; Plaintiff
filed a response on May 8, 2013, in which he indicated that he was unaware that he was required to
serve Defendant within 120 days, and asked for an additional 60 days to serve the complaint. On May
13, 2013, this Court granted Plaintiff’s request and gave him an additional sixty days to serve Defendant
and file a proof of service of the summons and complaint, and indicated that failure to do so would result
in dismissal of this action.
Plaintiff has yet to file any proof of service; thus, this Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint
WIHTOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with this Court’s May 13, 2013 Order. See Local Rule
83-7.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PMC
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?