Mary Suddeth v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., Target Stores (a Division of Target Corporation, erroneously served and sued herein as Target Corporation) terminated. (shb)

1
2
3
4
5
6

LLP

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ERROR! MAIN DOCUMENT ONLY.LAW OFFICES OF
PRINDLE, AMARO, GOETZ, HILLYARD, BARNES & REINHOLTZ

7

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10
11

MARY SUDDETH,
Plaintiff,

12
13

CASE NO. CV12-7002 JAK (AGRx)

v.

14
15

TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES
1 through 30, Inclusive,
Defendants.

16

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT,
TARGET STORES, A DIVISION OF
TARGET CORPORATION
JS-6

17
18
19
20
21
22

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the
Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED:

August 28, 2013

23
24

___________________________________
U.S. District Judge John Kronstadt

25
26
27
28
1
RDC/TARGET/PLEADINGS/SUDDETH/Stipulation_Dismissal_Order

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF DEFT., TARGET STORES, A DIVISION OF TARGET CORP.