Mary Suddeth v. Target Corporation et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., Target Stores (a Division of Target Corporation, erroneously served and sued herein as Target Corporation) terminated. (shb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ERROR! MAIN DOCUMENT ONLY.LAW OFFICES OF
PRINDLE, AMARO, GOETZ, HILLYARD, BARNES & REINHOLTZ
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
CASE NO. CV12-7002 JAK (AGRx)
TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES
1 through 30, Inclusive,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT,
TARGET STORES, A DIVISION OF
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the
Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED
August 28, 2013
U.S. District Judge John Kronstadt
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF DEFT., TARGET STORES, A DIVISION OF TARGET CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?