United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al

Filing 91

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS by Judge Margaret M. Morrow: On April 30, 2015, the court entered an order granting defendants' motion to dismiss the federal claims in the third amended complaint with prejudice. It dismissed the state law claims with out prejudice to their refiling in state court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That plaintiffs take nothing by way of the federal False Act Claims alleged in the third amended complaint; 2. That plaintiffs' state law claims be dismissed without prejudice; and 2. That the action be, and it is hereby, dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

1

JS-6

2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
Doris Modglin and Russ Milko,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
DJO GLOBAL INC., DJO LLC, DJO
FINANCE LLC, ORTHOFIX, INC.,
BIOMET, INC. and EBI, LP,
Defendants.

14

) CASE NO. CV 12-07152 MMM (JCGx)
)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15
16

On April 30, 2015, the court entered an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the

17

federal claims in the third amended complaint with prejudice. It dismissed the state law claims

18

without prejudice to their refiling in state court. Accordingly,

19
20

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

21

1. That plaintiffs take nothing by way of the federal False Act Claims alleged in the

22

third amended complaint;

23

2. That plaintiffs’ state law claims be dismissed without prejudice; and

24

2. That the action be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

25
26
27
28

DATED: May 8, 2015
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE