Brian Friedman et al v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC et al

Filing 77

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MERCDES-BENZ USA LLC. by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of MBUSA. MBUSA shall recover its costs against Plaintiffs in a sum to be determined upon the submis sion of a memorandum of costs. RE: in favor of Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA LLC, Mercedes Benz USA LLC against Daniel Brown Related to: Order on Motion to Compel Arbitration, Order on Motion to Supplement,, Order on Motion to Dismiss, 53 , Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, Order on Motion for Sanctions, 75 (lw)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Troy M. Yoshino, No. 197850
Matthew J. Kemner, No. 188126
Richard J. Zuromski, Jr., No. 227569
CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP
Attorneys at Law
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415.989.0932
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

BRIAN FRIEDMAN and DANIEL
BROWN,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,
v.
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability
Company; KEYES EUROPEAN
LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company; MERCEDES-BENZ
FINANCIAL SERVICES USA,
LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company; and Does 1 through 10,
inclusive,

No. CV 12-7204-GAF (CWx)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MERCEDESBENZ USA, LLC
Action Filed: July 13, 2012
Discovery Cut-Off: None
Hon. Gary Allan Feess

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-MERCEDES\SF579240
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MBUSA—CASE NO. CV 12-7204-GAF-CW

JUDGMENT

1

Pursuant to the Court’s January 31, 2013 Order (Dkt. 53) dismissing

2
3

plaintiff Daniel Brown’s claims against MBUSA without leave to amend, and the

4

Court’s June 12, 2013 Order (Dkt. 75) dismissing plaintiff Brian Friedman’s

5

against MSUSA claims with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED

6

and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of MBUSA.1
MBUSA shall recover its costs against Plaintiffs in a sum to be

7
8

determined upon the submission of a memorandum of costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

July 11
DATED: ______________, 2013

11

___________________________
Honorable Gary A. Feess
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the Court finds that there is no
reason to delay entry of judgment in favor of MBUSA.
CBM-MERCEDES\SF579240
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MBUSA—CASE NO. CV 12-7204-GAF-CW