Marquise Daniel Carr v. G D Lewis

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 17 ; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habe as Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 MARQUISE D. CARR, Petitioner, 12 13 14 15 v. G.D. LEWIS, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 12-7339-DMG (JEM) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of 19 the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation 20 have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and 21 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 23 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: February 18, 2014 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?