Enfish LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 309

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that: Pursuant to the Court's Order, final judgment against Plaintiff Enfish, LLC shall be entered in favor of each Defendant, Microsoft Corporation; Fise rv, Inc.; Intuit, Inc.; Sage Software, Inc.; and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., as a prevailing party. Enfish's Complaint, as amended, and all of its asserted causes of action are dismissed with prejudice and Enfish shall recover nothing in this action. Defendants' respective counterclaims for a declaration that the asserted claims of the '604 and '775 patents are invalid are granted. Defendants' respective counterclaims for a declaration that each Defendant has not infr inged the '604 patent are granted as to claim 17. Except as expressly granted above, Defendants' respective counterclaims and defenses are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Defendants are entitled to recover their costs incurred in this action. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

15
16
17

FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. CV12-7360 MRP (MRWx)

ENFISH, LLC,

v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION;
FISERV, INC.; INTUIT, INC.; SAGE
SOFTWARE, INC.; and JACK HENRY
& ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV12-7360 MRP (MRWx)

41826-3052/LEGAL124279180.1

Final Judgment

1

Plaintiff Enfish, LLC (“Enfish”) filed this lawsuit against Defendants

2

Microsoft Corporation; Fiserv, Inc.; Intuit, Inc.; Sage Software, Inc.; and Jack Henry

3

& Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that each Defendant had

4

infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,151,604 and 6,163,775 (the “’604 and ’775 patents).

5

[Dkts. 1 & 30] Each Defendant answered, asserting defenses and declaratory

6

judgment counterclaims that it has not infringed the ’604 or ’775 patents and that

7

both patents are invalid. [Dkts. 33, 35, 37, 39 & 41]

8

By orders entered on March 31, November 11 and November 21, 2014 (Dkts.

9

241, 242, 303 and 306), this Court granted summary judgment in Defendants’ favor

10

on all asserted claims in the ’604 and ’775 patents as follows: (i) claims 31, 32, 46

11

and 47 of the ’604 patent and claims 31, 32 and 47 of the ’775 patent are invalid for

12

anticipation by the prior art; (ii) claims 1, 2 and 16 of the ’604 patent are invalid

13

under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f); (iii) claims 1, 2, 16, 17, 31, 32, 46 and 47 of the ’604 patent

14

and claims 31, 32 and 47 of the ’775 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and

15

(iv) Defendants have not infringed claim 17 of the ’604 patent.

16
17
18

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES
THAT:
1.

19
20

Pursuant to the Court’s Order, final judgment against Enfish shall be
entered in favor of each Defendant as a prevailing party;

2.

Enfish’s Complaint, as amended, and all of its asserted causes of action

21

are dismissed with prejudice and Enfish shall recover nothing in this

22

action;

23

3.

24
25

claims of the ’604 and ’775 patents are invalid are granted;
4.

26
27
28

Defendants’ respective counterclaims for a declaration that the asserted

Defendants’ respective counterclaims for a declaration that each
Defendant has not infringed the’604 patent are granted as to claim 17;

5.

Except as expressly granted above, Defendants’ respective
counterclaims and defenses are dismissed without prejudice as moot.

41826-3052/LEGAL124279180.1

-1Final Judgment

CV12-7360 MRP (MRWx)

1

6.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and Local Rules

2

54-2 and 54-3, Defendants are entitled to recover their costs incurred in

3

this action; and

4

7.

Any request by Defendants for an award of attorneys’ fees and related

5

nontaxable expenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)

6

shall be made pursuant to Local Rule 54-10.

7

Because no claims are remaining in this action, the Court expressly directs the

8

Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

9

Procedure 58.

10
11

DATED: November 26, 2014
The Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
41826-3052/LEGAL124279180.1

-2Final Judgment

CV12-7360 MRP (MRWx)