Karol Western Corp v. Smith News Company Inc

Filing 165

FINAL JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment herein be against Plaintiff Karol Western Corp. and in favor of and for Defendant Smith News Company, Inc. Related to: Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law 164 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

JS-6
1
2
3
4

H. MICHAEL BRUCKER LAW CORPORATION
H. MICHAEL BRUCKER (#36297)
5855 Doyle Street — Suite 110
Emeryville, California 94608
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

9

STEVEN M. KIPPERMAN LAW CORPORATION
STEVEN M. KIPPERMAN (#40895)
220 Montgomery Street — Suite 1077
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10

Counsel for Defendant Smith News Co.

6
7
8

11
12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

KAROL WESTERN CORP.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SMITH NEWS COMPANY, INC., )
dba SMITH NOVELTY
)
COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________

Case No. CV-12- 7695 BRO (VBKx)
FINAL JUDGMENT FOR
DEFENDANT

1
2

JUDGMENT

3
4
5
6

This case was tried to the court commencing on March 27, 2014, and
ending on April 7, 2014. The court having heard and received oral and
documentary evidence, having heard the argument of counsel, having considered

7
8

all briefs filed before and after the trial, having filed its FINDINGS OF FACTS

9

AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER COURT TRIAL (filed 9/2/14, Doc

10

#164), having found and concluded there was no copyright infringement by

11
12
13
14
15
16

Defendant, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment herein be
against Plaintiff Karol Western Corp. and in favor of and for Defendant Smith
News Company, Inc.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

Dated: September 17, 2014

21

____________________________________
HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT