VMR Products LLC v. VAS Media Group Inc et al
Filing
14
STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 13 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: Defendants Zcor Inc. ("Zcor") d.b.a. Emerald Lux, and VAS Media Group, Inc. ("VAS") and their respect ive officers, agents, owners, servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert and participation with them are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from using any Plaintiff VMR Products LLC, ("VMR") trademarks or an y variation thereof, specifically including, but not limited to: V2CIGS and V2, etc. The causes of action between parties, inclusive of all John Does named herein, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties The parties shall each bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk)
1 TODD M. MALYNN (State Bar No.:181595)
Email: tmalynn@feldmangale.com
2 GREGORY L. HILLYER (Florida Bar No.:068064)
Email: ghillyer@feldmangale.com
3 ALEJANDRO J. FERNANDEZ (Florida Bar No.:32221)
Email: afernandez@feldmangale.com
4 FELDMAN GALE, P.A.
880 West First Street, Suite 315
5 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone No. (213) 625-5992
6 Facsimile No. (213) 625-5993
JS-6
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff
VMR PRODUCTS, LLC
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 VMR PRODUCTS, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
VAS MEDIA GROUP, INC., a California
16 corporation;
17 ZCOR, INC. d.b.a. EMERALD LUX, a
California corporation; and
18
JOHN DOES 1-10
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: CV12-7751-CAS (FMOx)
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, VMR Products LLC, (“VMR”), Zcor Inc. (“Zcor”) d.b.a. Emerald Lux, and VAS
23 Media Group, Inc. (“VAS”) (collectively, the “parties”) having reached an agreement for the
24 purpose of compromising and resolving the disputes between them and having consented to the
25 entry of this Order, either personally or through their undersigned counsel, and after consideration,
26 it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
27
1.
Zcor and VAS have accepted service of the Amended Complaint in this suit, and
28 hereby submit to the personal jurisdiction of this Court.
1
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
1
2.
VMR owns all right, title and interest in the mark V2CIGS® trademark, as
2 identified in Paragraph 5 of the Amended Complaint (“the V2CIGS® mark”).
3
3.
The V2CIGS® mark is valid and enforceable.
4.
Based on VMR’s ownership and good faith prior use of the V2CIGS® mark, VMR
4
5
6 has superior and exclusive rights in and to the V2CIGS® marks in the United States and any
7 confusingly similar names or marks.
8
5.
Zcor adopted and began using the mark V2 in connection with the sale of electronic
9 cigarettes at least through its website www.emeraldlux.com, and thereby infringed VMR’s
10 registered V2CIGS® trademark.
11
12
13
14
6.
Zcor’s use of names and marks incorporating the term V2 is likely to cause
confusion as to source or origin.
7.
The parties desire to settle and have amicably resolved their dispute to each of their
15 satisfaction, and have memorialized the terms of such settlement in a Settlement Agreement,
16 executed on January 22, 2013.
17
RELIEF GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF:
18
8.
Zcor and VAS, and their respective officers, agents, owners, servants, employees
19
and attorneys and all persons in active concert and participation with them are hereby permanently
20
restrained and enjoined from:
21
22
(a)
using any VMR trademarks or any variation thereof,
®
23 specifically including, but not limited to: V2CIGS and V2;
24
(b)
diluting, blurring, passing off or falsely designating the origin
25 of any VMR trademark and from injuring VMR’s goodwill and reputation;
26
(c)
doing any other act or thing likely to induce the belief that the
27 Zcor’s products are in any way connected with, sponsored, affiliated, licensed, or endorsed
28 by VMR;
2
STIPLUATED JUDGMENT
(d)
1
using or displaying any VMR mark or any variation thereof,
2 including without limitation V2CIGS® or V2, for goods or services in any location,
3 circumstance or environment, including on the Internet, or as domain names, email
4 addresses, meta tags, invisible data, or otherwise engaging in acts or conduct that would
5 cause confusion as to the source, sponsorship or affiliation of Defendants with VMR;
6
9.
Any party shall have the right to seek sanctions for contempt, compensatory
7 damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and such other relief as deemed proper in
8 the event of a violation or failure to comply with any of the provisions hereof. The
9 prevailing party in any such proceeding shall be entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees and
10 costs.
11
10.
The causes of action between parties, inclusive of all John Does named
12 herein, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of the Settlement
13 Agreement between the parties.
14
11.
The parties shall each bear their respective attorneys’ fees and costs incurred
15 in connection with this action.
16
12.
This Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over this cause to enforce the
17 terms of this Stipulated Judgment and Permanent Injunction and the Settlement
18 Agreement.
19
SO ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2013.
20
21
_______________________
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPLUATED JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
5
CONSENTED TO BY:
FELDMAN GALE, P.A.
6 /s/Todd M. Malynn
Todd M. Malynn
7 CA State Bar No.: 181595
880 West First Street, Suite 315
8 Los Angeles, California 90012
Phone: 213/625-5992
9 Facsimile: 213/625-5993
10
11
12
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF VMR PRODUCTS, LLC
AND
M.E.T.A.L. Law Group
13
/s/John W. Fagerholm
14 John W. Fagerholm
CA State Bar No. 213852
15 M.E.T.A.L. Law Group, LLP
5757 Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse 3
16 Los Angeles, CA 90036
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPLUATED JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?