Peli Popovich Hunt et al v. Horwitz Cron and Armstrong LLP et al

Filing 90

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: By order dated 7/8/2013, this Court dismissed this action with prejudice against defendants United States of America, Miller, Lev, Goodrich, Gould, Selth, Pearlson, and Weintraub & Selth APC. The Co urt declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction against plaintiff's remaining claims against defendants Armstrong and Horwitz, Cron & Armstrong, LLP. On 8/30/2013, plaintiff Peli Popovich Hunt filed a "Request for Entry of Judgment," ; pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rules 59, 77, and 79 87 . The Court's order dated 7/8/2013, dismissing this action with prejudice as to the moving defendants, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims asserted against the remaining defendants, suffices as a final order in this case. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

O

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 12-7866 CAS (RZx)

Title

PELI POPOVICH HUNT, ET AL. V HORWITZ, CRON &
ARMSTRONG LLP, ET AL.

Present: The Honorable

Date

September 17, 2013

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

M. SALCIDO
Deputy Clerk

N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder

N/A
Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers:) REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
(Docket #87, filed August 30, 2013)

The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.
R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the matter is hereby taken under
submission.
By order dated July 8, 2013, this Court dismissed this action with prejudice against
defendants United States of America, Miller, Lev, Goodrich, Gould, Selth, Pearlson, and
Weintraub & Selth APC. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
against plaintiff’s remaining claims against defendants Armstrong and Horwitz, Cron &
Armstrong, LLP.
On August 30, 2013, plaintiff Peli Popovich Hunt filed a “ Request for Entry of
Judgment,” pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rules 59, 77, and 79. Request Entry
Judgment 2. Dkt. #87.
The Court’s order dated July 8, 2013, dismissing this action with prejudice as to
the moving defendants, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the
claims asserted against the remaining defendants, suffices as a final order in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00

:

00

Initials of Preparer
MS

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1