Matthew D Bales v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $4350. 20 (san)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Manuel D. Serpa, Calif. Bar No. 174182 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 770 The City Drive South Suite 2000 Orange, CA 92868 Phone (714) 564-8644 Fax (714) 940-0311 Email: mds.esq@gmail.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Matthew D. Bales 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WESTERN DIVISION 13 MATTHEW D. BALES, 14 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 CAROLYN W. COLVIN1, Commissioner of Social Security, 19 Defendant. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 12-08061-JEM PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 21 22 23 24 1 25 26 27 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 28 1 1 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 2 Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall 3 be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND 4 dollars and 00/100’s ($4,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount 5 of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($350.00), subject to 6 the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to 7 Plaintiff’s counsel. 8 Dated: October 4, 2013 9 10 HON. JOHN E. MCDERMOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?