David Martinez v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
Filing
35
JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant UPS that Plaintiff David Martinez take nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits by Judge S. James Otero. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 34 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
DAVID MARTINEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx)
JUDGMENT
v.
Complaint Filed: August 10, 2012
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; and
DOES 1 to 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Date:
Time:
June 24, 2013
10:00 a.m.
Judge:
Hon. S. James Otero
Courtroom: 1
16
Magistrate: Hon. Jay C. Gandhi
Courtroom: A
17
18
Trial Date:
October 18. 2013
19
20
Defendant United Parcel Service Inc.’s (“UPS”) Motion for Summary
21
Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues came on regularly
22
for hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 24, 2013 in Courtroom 1 of this Court, the
23
Honorable S. James Otero, presiding. Upon full consideration of all the papers
24
submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the evidence presented by the
25
parties, the issues having been heard and a decision having been rendered, this Court
26
orders summary judgment in favor of UPS as follows:
27
28
-1-
Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx)
JUDGMENT
1
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of
2
Defendant UPS that Plaintiff David Martinez take nothing, and that the action be
3
dismissed on the merits.
4
5
Dated: July 08, 2013
6
HON. S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
00881949.DOC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx)
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?