David Martinez v. United Parcel Service Inc et al

Filing 35

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant UPS that Plaintiff David Martinez take nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits by Judge S. James Otero. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 34 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 DAVID MARTINEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx) JUDGMENT v. Complaint Filed: August 10, 2012 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. Date: Time: June 24, 2013 10:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. S. James Otero Courtroom: 1 16 Magistrate: Hon. Jay C. Gandhi Courtroom: A 17 18 Trial Date: October 18. 2013 19 20 Defendant United Parcel Service Inc.’s (“UPS”) Motion for Summary 21 Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues came on regularly 22 for hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 24, 2013 in Courtroom 1 of this Court, the 23 Honorable S. James Otero, presiding. Upon full consideration of all the papers 24 submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the evidence presented by the 25 parties, the issues having been heard and a decision having been rendered, this Court 26 orders summary judgment in favor of UPS as follows: 27 28 -1- Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx) JUDGMENT 1 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of 2 Defendant UPS that Plaintiff David Martinez take nothing, and that the action be 3 dismissed on the merits. 4 5 Dated: July 08, 2013 6 HON. S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 00881949.DOC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case No. 12cv8089 SJO (JCGx) JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?