Mayra Davila v. RTI Properties Inc et al

Filing 61

JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Having reviewed Defendants RTI Properties, Inc., BBK Carlin, LLC, and Rosa Maria de la Rosas offer of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 to Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation, and Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundations acceptance of Defendants offer of judgment 51 , judgment is entered as follows: 1. Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation; and 2. Defendants to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CLOSED 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) RTI PROPERTIES, INC., a California ) corporation; BBK CARLIN, LLC, a ) California limited liability company; JUDITH A. CARROLL, individually and ) ) as trustee of the JUDI A. CARROLL LIVING TRUST, and ROSA MARIA DE ) ) LA ROSA, an individual, ) ) Defendants. ) MAYRA DAVILA and KIMBERLY YANTUCHE, individuals, and FAIR HOUSING FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit corporation, Case No.: CV12-08176-DDP (VBKx) Assigned to Courtroom: 3 The Hon. Dean D. Pregerson JUDGMENT Having reviewed Defendants RTI Properties, Inc., BBK Carlin, LLC, and Rosa Maria de la Rosa’s offer of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 to Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation, and Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation’s acceptance of Defendants’ offer of judgment, -1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered as 2 follows: 3 1. Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation; and 4 2. Defendants to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to Plaintiff Fair Housing 5 Foundation. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: January 15, 2014 ______________________________ Honorable Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?