Mayra Davila v. RTI Properties Inc et al
Filing
61
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Having reviewed Defendants RTI Properties, Inc., BBK Carlin, LLC, and Rosa Maria de la Rosas offer of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 to Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation, and Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundations acceptance of Defendants offer of judgment 51 , judgment is entered as follows: 1. Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation; and 2. Defendants to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CLOSED
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
RTI PROPERTIES, INC., a California
)
corporation; BBK CARLIN, LLC, a
)
California limited liability company;
JUDITH A. CARROLL, individually and )
)
as trustee of the JUDI A. CARROLL
LIVING TRUST, and ROSA MARIA DE )
)
LA ROSA, an individual,
)
)
Defendants.
)
MAYRA DAVILA and KIMBERLY
YANTUCHE, individuals, and FAIR
HOUSING FOUNDATION, a California
nonprofit corporation,
Case No.: CV12-08176-DDP (VBKx)
Assigned to Courtroom: 3
The Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
JUDGMENT
Having reviewed Defendants RTI Properties, Inc., BBK Carlin, LLC, and
Rosa Maria de la Rosa’s offer of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 to
Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation, and Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation’s
acceptance of Defendants’ offer of judgment,
-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered as
2
follows:
3
1.
Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Fair Housing Foundation; and
4
2.
Defendants to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to Plaintiff Fair Housing
5
Foundation.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: January 15, 2014
______________________________
Honorable Dean D. Pregerson
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?