Humberto Daniel Klee et al v. Nissan North America Inc et al

Filing 23

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court orders Plaintiffs to file a brief, not to exceed five pages, by Friday, January 4, 2013 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (lc). Modified on 12/17/2012 (lc). Modified on 12/17/2012 (lc).

1
2

O

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

HUMBERTO DANIEL KLEE and
DAVID WALLAK, individually
and on behalf of a class of
similarly situated
individuals,

14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.;
NISSAN MOTOR COMPANY, LTD,

17
Defendants.
18
___________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 12-08238 DDP (PJWx)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

19
20

Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause why this action should

21

not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

22

U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(B), a district court must decline to exercise

23

jurisdiction when greater than two-thirds of the members of all

24

proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate are citizens of the

25

State in which the action was originally filed.

26

Complaint, it is not clear what percentage of California citizens

27

the class comprises.

28

file a brief, not to exceed five pages, by Friday, January 4, 2013

Under 28

From the

Accordingly, the court orders Plaintiffs to

1

to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of

2

subject matter jurisdiction.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: December 17, 2012
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2