Maren Equipment Leasing et al v. DHL Express USA

Filing 94

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:That plaintiffs Maren Equipment Leasing, Inc., Gary E. Smith, and ElliotMason shall take nothing from defendant DHL Express (USA), Inc. (DHL), thatjudgment for DHL is granted. DHL may apply for recovery of its costs of suit. 92 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

EDWIN V. WOODSOME, JR. (SBN 56305)
Email: [e-mail]
CHRISTOPHER S. RUHLAND (SBN 175054)
Email: [e-mail]
JAMES C. WALD (SBN 229108)
Email: [e-mail]
DECHERT LLP
US Bank Tower
633 West 5th Street
37th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14

MAREN EQUIPMENT LEASING,
INC., a California corporation, GARY
E. SMITH, an individual, and ELLIOT
MASON, an individual,
Plaintiffs,

15
16

JUDGMENT
Judge: Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell

v.

17

Case No. 2:12-CV-08244-BRO (VBKx)

DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., an Ohio
corporation, et al.,

18

Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

15070128

JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-08244-BRO (VBKx)

1
2

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion For
Summary Judgment dated October 22, 2013 [Dkt. No. 92],

3

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

4
5
6

That plaintiffs Maren Equipment Leasing, Inc., Gary E. Smith, and Elliot
Mason shall take nothing from defendant DHL Express (USA), Inc. (“DHL”), that
judgment for DHL is granted. DHL may apply for recovery of its costs of suit.

7
IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: October 24, 2013

10
11

____________________________________
HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

15070128

-1-

JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-08244-BRO (VBKx)