Alan Williams v. Anthony Hedgepeth
Filing
104
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re REQUEST for Protective Order STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 103 (dml)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
LANCE E. WINTERS
Chief Assistant Attorney General
SUSAN SULLIVAN PITHEY
Senior Assistant Attorney General
XIOMARA COSTELLO
Deputy Attorney General
TAYLOR NGUYEN
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 213785
300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 269-6009
Fax: (916) 731-2122
E-mail: DocketingLAAWT@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Respondent
10 CUAUHTÉMOC ORTEGA (Bar No. 257443)
Federal Public Defender
11 MORIAH S. RADIN (Bar No. 260245)
Deputy Federal Public Defender
12 321 East 2nd Street
Los Angeles, California 90012-4202
13 Telephone: (213) 894-5192
Facsimile: (213) 894-0081
14 E-mail: Moriah_Radin@fd.org
15 Attorneys for Petitioner
ALAN WILLIAMS
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
ALAN WILLIAMS,
22
23
24
25
26
v.
Case No. CV 12-08287-MCS (RAO)
Petitioner, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden,
Respondent. The Honorable Rozella A. Oliver
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
1
1
Pursuant to Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc),
2
Petitioner and Respondent, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and
3
agree as follows:
4
1)
Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Discovery Stipulation filed June 10,
5
2021, and this Court’s order approving the Joint Discovery Stipulation filed
6
June 11, 2021, the parties expect to receive documents and other materials
7
from: (a) the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender’s Office or
8
Deputy Alternate Public Defender Jason D. Sanabria, including his or their
9
investigators or staff, in connection with their representation of Petitioner in
10
People v. Williams, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. TA088616;
11
(b) trial counsel Mawuli Bakari, including his investigators or staff, in
12
connection with his representation of Petitioner in People v. Williams, Los
13
Angeles County Superior Court Case No. TA088616; (c) post-verdict counsel
14
Andy A. Miri and/or Lawrence R. Young, including each of their
15
investigators or staff, in connection with their representation of Petitioner in
16
People v. Williams, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. TA088616;
17
(d) appellate attorney Mark S. Givens, including his staff, in connection with
18
his representation of Petitioner on direct state appeal in People v. Williams,
19
California Court of Appeal Case No. B209510; and/or (e) habeas counsel,
20
Paul McCarthy and/or Robert J. Beles, including either of their staff, in
21
connection with their representation of Petitioner in the instant habeas action.
22
In addition, the parties anticipate some testimony at the evidentiary hearing
23
will relate to the documents and materials referenced above, and,
24
subsequently, anticipate the transcript of the hearing and the parties’ post-
25
hearing briefs submitted to the Court will also reference the documents and
26
materials described in this paragraph.
27
2)
28
received from the persons identified in paragraph 1 pursuant to the Joint
The parties stipulate and agree that any and all documents or materials
2
1
Discovery Stipulation are confidential, privileged, or both, and may otherwise
2
contain private information for which special protection from public
3
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation
4
may be warranted. Any testimony at the evidentiary hearing divulging or
5
revealing confidential and/or privileged information, including the transcript
6
of such testimony, shall also be accorded special protection from public
7
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation.
8
The parties further agree and stipulate that any and all of the following
9
documents or materials are not confidential or privileged and are not protected
10
by this Protective Order: any and all documents or materials that were
11
available to or in the possession of the prosecution, law enforcement, or
12
Respondent, before the filing of the Joint Discovery Stipulation, and any and
13
all documents that were publicly filed or otherwise disclosed before the filing
14
of the Joint Discovery Stipulation.
15
3)
16
used only for purposes of litigating this habeas action. The protected
17
documents or materials must not be disclosed to persons other than:
All privileged documents or materials produced in this action may be
18
a)
Counsel for the parties and all members of the parties’ legal
19
teams, including, but not limited to, paralegal, investigative, support,
20
stenographic, clerical, and secretarial staff, and related personnel
21
regularly employed by counsel referred to in subparagraph (a) above,
22
but no confidential or identifying information relating to the victims
23
and/or witnesses shall be disclosed to Petitioner;
24
b)
25
reporters engaged in such proceedings as are necessarily incidental to
26
preparation for the trial of this action; and
27
c)
28
for the purpose of this litigation.
The Court and Court personnel, including stenographic
Expert witnesses designated by counsel for the parties solely
3
1
4)
Except as permitted by Paragraph 3, and excluding the documents
2
designated as unprotected or unprivileged in Paragraph 2, disclosure of the
3
contents of the documents and the documents themselves shall not be made to
4
any other persons or agencies, including, but not limited to, prosecutorial
5
agencies and law enforcement personnel, without the Court’s order.
6
5)
7
blanket protection of protected documents and that the protection it affords
8
from public disclosure and use outside the litigation of this federal habeas
9
action extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to
The parties acknowledge that this Protective Order does not confer
10
confidential or privileged treatment under California or federal law. In other
11
words, an unprivileged document or item does not become privileged or
12
confidential by virtue of this Protective Order. The parties further
13
acknowledge that this Protective Order does not entitle them to file
14
confidential information under seal. Each party will comply with Local Rule
15
79-5 if the party seeks to file any document or material under seal. It is the
16
intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential or
17
otherwise protected for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated
18
without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-
19
public manner.
20
6)
21
shall be clearly designated as such by labeling the document or material in a
22
manner that does not prevent reading the text of the document or otherwise
23
viewing the material.
24
7)
25
are filed with this Court’s permission, they shall be submitted in a manner
26
reflecting their confidential nature and designed to ensure that the privileged
27
material will not become part of the public record. Testimony from the
28
evidentiary hearing relating to privileged matters shall be clearly designated
Privileged documents and testimony relating to privileged matters
If privileged documents or documents containing privileged matters
4
1
as such by marking the transcripts of the proceeding. The parties may seek
2
Court approval to file under seal any pleading or other papers served on
3
opposing counsel, or filed or lodged with the Court that contains or reveals
4
the substantive content of the privileged matter. The filing shall include a
5
separate caption page that includes the following confidentiality notice or its
6
equivalent. If physical documents or materials are filed with the Court, they
7
shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court in sealed envelopes prominently
8
marked with the caption of the case and the following confidentiality notice:
9
TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL
10
THIS ITEM CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO A
11
PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IS NOT TO BE OPENED NOR ITS
12
CONTENTS DISPLAYED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT COURT ORDER.
13
8)
14
any documents filed in accordance with the above. Insofar as reasonably
15
feasible, only confidential portions of the filings shall be under seal; and the
16
parties shall tailor their documents to limit, as much as is practicable, the
17
quantity of material that is to be filed under seal. When a pleading or
18
document contains only a limited amount of privileged content, a party may
19
file a complete copy under seal and at the same time file on the public record
20
an additional, redacted version of the document, blocking out the limited
21
matter comprising the confidential portions.
22
9)
23
action, and related testimony by Petitioner or members of Petitioner’s trial
24
team at the evidentiary hearing in this case, does not constitute a waiver of
25
Petitioner’s rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States
26
Constitution in the event of any retrial.
27
Petitioner’s disclosure of documents from trial counsel’s file in this
///
28
The Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain the confidentiality of
///
5
1
10)
This Protective Order shall survive the final disposition for this action
2
and shall remain in full force and effect after conclusion of all proceedings
3
herein, and the Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to enforce its terms.
4
SO STIPULATED:
5
6
Dated: June 29, 2021
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
LANCE E. WINTERS
Chief Assistant Attorney General
SUSAN SULLIVAN PITHEY
Senior Assistant Attorney General
XIOMARA COSTELLO
Deputy Attorney General
7
8
9
10
11
/s/ Taylor Nguyen
TAYLOR NGUYEN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Respondent
12
13
14
CUAUHTÉMOC ORTEGA
Federal Public Defender
15
16
17
/s/ Moriah S. Radin
MORIAH S. RADIN
Deputy Federal Public Defender
Attorneys for Petitioner
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: June 30, 2021
The Honorable Rozella A. Oliver
United States Magistrate Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?