Angel Uribe et al v. All State Cleaning et al

Filing 91

JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Defendant All States Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED 90 and that judgment shall be entered in favor of All State against Plaintiffs Angel Uribe and Gustavo Uribe. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

ROGER M. MANSUKHANI (CA BAR NO.: 164463)
Email: [e-mail]
GINA HAGGERTY LINDELL (CA BAR NO.: 217258)
Email: [e-mail]
GEORGE P. SOARES (CA BAR NO.: 213996)
Email: [e-mail]
GORDON & REES LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant
ALL STATE CLEANING, L.P.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-08351 DDP (PLAx)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
Plaintiffs,
) [LINK TO 90]
)
vs.
)
ALL STATE CLEANING, CLASSEN )
)
ENTERPRISES INC. and CARLOS
)
MUNGUIA,
)
Defendants. )
)

19

Defendant All State Cleaning, L.P.’s (“All State”) Motion for Summary

12
13
14
15
16
17

ANGEL URIBE and GUSTAVO
URIBE,

20

Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment came on regularly for

21

hearing before this Court on September 8, 2014.
After considering the briefs, separate statements, evidence, and objections to

22
23

evidence filed by the parties, and the arguments of counsel, the Court concludes

24

that there are no genuine issues of material fact, and that All State is entitled to

25

judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

26

///

27

///

28
-1
CAPTION
JUDGMENT
Case No. 2:12-cv-08351 DDP (PLAx)

1

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT

2

Defendant All State’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that

3

judgment shall be entered in favor of All State against Plaintiffs Angel Uribe and

4

Gustavo Uribe.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

DATED: November 13, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1086354/19913981v.1

-2
CAPTION
JUDGMENT
Case No. 2:12-cv-08351 DDP (PLAx)