Petra Ann Parker v. LA Care Health Plan

Filing 34

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS. The Court has not received Plaintiff's Opposition to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's opposition was due August 26, 2013. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show ca use why this case should not be dismissed and/or the Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff must respond to this order no later than Friday, September 13, 2013. Failure to file a response risks dismissal of the entire action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)

Download PDF
LINK: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. CV 12-8366 BRO (FMOx) Title Petra Ann Parker v. LA Care Health Plan Date September 9, 2013   Present: The Honorable BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge Renee A. Fisher Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST L.A. CARE HEALTH PLAN [Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(B)(6] (filed 8/16/13) [31] The Court has not received Plaintiff’s Opposition to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff’s opposition was due August 26, 2013. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed and/or the Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff must respond to this order no later than Friday, September 13, 2013. Failure to file a response risks dismissal of the entire action. IT IS SO ORDERED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL rf Page 1 of 1  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?