Petra Ann Parker v. LA Care Health Plan
Filing
34
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS. The Court has not received Plaintiff's Opposition to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's opposition was due August 26, 2013. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show ca use why this case should not be dismissed and/or the Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff must respond to this order no later than Friday, September 13, 2013. Failure to file a response risks dismissal of the entire action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)
LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
CV 12-8366 BRO (FMOx)
Title
Petra Ann Parker v. LA Care Health Plan
Date
September 9, 2013
Present: The Honorable
BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge
Renee A. Fisher
Not Present
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AGAINST L.A. CARE HEALTH PLAN [Fed. R. Civ. P.
Rule 12(B)(6] (filed 8/16/13) [31]
The Court has not received Plaintiff’s Opposition to defendant's Motion to
Dismiss. Plaintiff’s opposition was due August 26, 2013.
Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed and/or
the Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff must respond to this order no
later than Friday, September 13, 2013.
Failure to file a response risks dismissal of the entire action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
rf
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?