Paul Olds v. 3M Company

Filing 443

JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judgment entered against plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretofore or hereafter in this action with respect to any other defendant are several as to each such defendant unless expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and several as to the particular defendants; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry of this final judgment against plaintiff and in favor o f United Technologies Corporation and, finding that good cause exists for entry of a separate judgment under Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court expressly directs that the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment in favor of United Technologies Corporation and against plaintiff herein pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 notwithstanding whether this action remains pending against other defendants. (pj)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

TUCKER ELLIS LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 PAUL OLDS,
12
13

Case No. 2:12-cv-08539-R (MRWx)
Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

v.

14 3M COMPANY a/k/a MINNESOTA
MINING & MANUFACTURING
15 COMPANY; et al.,
16

Defendants.

17
18

Defendant United Technologies Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment

19 came on regularly for hearing on January 27, 2014, before the Honorable Manuel L. Real
20 in Department 8 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
21 All appearances are as reflected in the record.
22

Having read and considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the

23 Motion, all admissible evidence filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, and
24 argument of counsel, and a decision having been duly rendered,
25

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is

26 hereby entered in favor of defendant United Technologies Corporation and against
27 plaintiff Paul Olds. Plaintiff shall take nothing by reason of his complaint herein against
28 United Technologies Corporation. Plaintiff’s complaint herein is dismissed on the merits
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
074908000772967803

1 and with prejudice as to United Technologies Corporation;
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judgment

3 entered against plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretofore or hereafter in
4 this action with respect to any other defendant are several as to each such defendant
5 unless expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and several as to the particular
6 defendants;
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry of this

8 final judgment against plaintiff and in favor of United Technologies Corporation and,
9 finding that good cause exists for entry of a separate judgment under Rule 54 of the

TUCKER ELLIS LLP

Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco

10 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court expressly directs that the Clerk of the Court
11 enter this separate judgment in favor of United Technologies Corporation and against
12 plaintiff herein pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 notwithstanding whether
13 this action remains pending against other defendants.
14
15 DATED: _Feb. 14, 2014__
16

_________________________________
Honorable Manuel L. Real
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
074908000772967803

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

TUCKER ELLIS LLP

Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Denver ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
074908000772967803