Paul Olds v. 3M Company

Filing 453

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO EATON AEROQUIP LLC, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO EATON AEROQUIP INC. F/K/A AEROQUIP CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff take nothing from defendant Aeroquip with respect to plaintiffs claims for relief asserted in his complaint, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Aeroquip. Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed with prejudice on the merits as to Aeroquip. (pj)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PAUL OLDS

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-08539-R-MWR
JUDGMENT

v.
3M COMPANY, et al.
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO EATON AEROQUIP LLC, SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO EATON AEROQUIP INC. F/K/A AEROQUIP
CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The motion of defendant EATON AEROQUIP LLC, successor by merger to
EATON AEROQUIP INC. f/k/a AEROQUIP CORPORATION (“Aeroquip”) for
summary judgment came on regularly for hearing before this Court on January 27,
2014. After consideration of the admissible evidence, the separate statements, and the
authorities of the parties, the Court hereby finds that there is no genuine issue as to
any material fact, and defendant Aeroquip is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
with respect to all causes of action as follows:
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1

1

1)

There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant Aeroquip

2

is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s First Cause of

3

Action for Negligence.

4

2)

There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant Aeroquip

5

is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s Second Cause of

6

Action for Strict Products Liability.

7

3)

There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant Aeroquip

8

is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiff’s Third Cause of

9

Action for Breach of Warranty.

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff take nothing from defendant

11

Aeroquip with respect to plaintiff’s claims for relief asserted in his complaint, and

12

judgment is entered in favor of defendant Aeroquip. Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed

13

with prejudice on the merits as to Aeroquip.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
16
17

DATED: February 18, 2014

______________________________
HON. MANUEL REAL

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
2