Paul Olds v. 3M Company

Filing 460

JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT CUMMINS,INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION by Judge Manuel L. Real, Related to: Order 458 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Cummins, Inc. shall have judgment against Pl aintiff Paul Olds (Plaintiff);IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretoforeor hereafter in this action against any other Plaintiff are several as to each such defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint andseveral as to the particular defendants; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entryof this final judgment against Defendant herein and the Court expressly directsthat the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiffherein pursuant to FRCP rule 54 notwithstanding whether this action remainspending against other Defendants. (pj)

Download PDF
1    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  10 PAUL OLDS,  11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff,  v.  3M COMPANY a/k/a MINNESOTA  MINING & MANUFACTURING  COMPANY, et al.,        Defendants.    Case No.  CV12‐08539 R(MRWx)   Assigned to:    Judge Manuel L. Real  Referred to:     Magistrate Judge                             Michael R. Wilner    JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT CUMMINS,  INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY  JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY  ADJUDICATION    Complaint Filed:  October 4, 2012  Trial Date:             March 11, 2014  17 18 Defendant Cummins, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment against  19 Plaintiff Paul Olds (“Motion”) came on regularly for hearing on January 27, 2014 at  20 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge  21 presiding in Courtroom 8 of the above‐referenced Court.  Appearances were noted  22 on the record.  The Court, having read and considered all papers filed in support of  23 the Motion, including all admissible evidence filed in support thereof, having read  24 and considered all papers filed in opposition to the Motion, including all  25 admissible evidence filed in opposition thereto, and having heard and  26 considered the arguments of counsel, the Court determined that no genuine issue  27 of material fact exists and that Defendant Cummins, Inc.’s Motion for Summary  28 1 1 Judgment should be granted.  Finding that good cause exists for entry of a separate judgment under rule  2 3 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure based on the foregoing,   IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant  4 5 Cummins, Inc. shall have judgment against Plaintiff Paul Olds (“Plaintiff”);  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment  6 7 entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretofore  8 or hereafter in this action against any other Plaintiff are several as to each such  9 defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and  10 several as to the particular defendants; and  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry  11 12 of this final judgment against Defendant herein and the Court expressly directs  13 that the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiff  14 herein pursuant to FRCP rule 54 notwithstanding whether this action remains  15 pending against other Defendants.  16   17 Dated: March 7, 2014       _________________________________  18   The Honorable Judge Manuel L. Real  19   Judge of the United States District Court  20   21   24       22 23       25 26 27     28 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  1 The undersigned, counsel for CUMMINS, INC., hereby certifies that a true  2 3 and correct copy of the foregoing [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT  4 CUMMINS, INC.’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  5 was filed with the Court and served electronically through the CM‐ECF (Electronic  6 Case Filing) system to all counsel of record and to those registered to receive a  7 Notice of Electronic Filing for this case on February 18, 2014.  8       9 10 11 12 /s/       Stuart E. Supowit___________                       Stuart E. Supowit       13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?