Paul Olds v. 3M Company
Filing
460
JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT CUMMINS,INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION by Judge Manuel L. Real, Related to: Order 458 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Cummins, Inc. shall have judgment against Pl aintiff Paul Olds (Plaintiff);IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretoforeor hereafter in this action against any other Plaintiff are several as to each such defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint andseveral as to the particular defendants; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entryof this final judgment against Defendant herein and the Court expressly directsthat the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiffherein pursuant to FRCP rule 54 notwithstanding whether this action remainspending against other Defendants. (pj)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PAUL OLDS,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
3M COMPANY a/k/a MINNESOTA
MINING & MANUFACTURING
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. CV12‐08539 R(MRWx)
Assigned to: Judge Manuel L. Real
Referred to: Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Wilner
JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT CUMMINS,
INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION
Complaint Filed: October 4, 2012
Trial Date: March 11, 2014
17
18
Defendant Cummins, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment against
19
Plaintiff Paul Olds (“Motion”) came on regularly for hearing on January 27, 2014 at
20
10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge
21
presiding in Courtroom 8 of the above‐referenced Court. Appearances were noted
22
on the record. The Court, having read and considered all papers filed in support of
23
the Motion, including all admissible evidence filed in support thereof, having read
24
and considered all papers filed in opposition to the Motion, including all
25
admissible evidence filed in opposition thereto, and having heard and
26
considered the arguments of counsel, the Court determined that no genuine issue
27
of material fact exists and that Defendant Cummins, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
28
1
1
Judgment should be granted.
Finding that good cause exists for entry of a separate judgment under rule
2
3
54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure based on the foregoing,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant
4
5
Cummins, Inc. shall have judgment against Plaintiff Paul Olds (“Plaintiff”);
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment
6
7
entered against the Plaintiff herein and any other judgments entered heretofore
8
or hereafter in this action against any other Plaintiff are several as to each such
9
defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and
10
several as to the particular defendants; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there is no just reason for delay in entry
11
12
of this final judgment against Defendant herein and the Court expressly directs
13
that the Clerk of the Court enter this separate judgment against said Plaintiff
14
herein pursuant to FRCP rule 54 notwithstanding whether this action remains
15
pending against other Defendants.
16
17
Dated: March 7, 2014
_________________________________
18
The Honorable Judge Manuel L. Real
19
Judge of the United States District Court
20
21
24
22
23
25
26
27
28
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
The undersigned, counsel for CUMMINS, INC., hereby certifies that a true
2
3
and correct copy of the foregoing [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT
4
CUMMINS, INC.’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
5
was filed with the Court and served electronically through the CM‐ECF (Electronic
6
Case Filing) system to all counsel of record and to those registered to receive a
7
Notice of Electronic Filing for this case on February 18, 2014.
8
9
10
11
12
/s/ Stuart E. Supowit___________
Stuart E. Supowit
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?