3M Unitek Corporation et al v. RMO Inc
Filing
20
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
3M UNITEK CORPORATION, a
CASE NO. CV12-08544 MMM (RZX)
INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
corporation,
Honorable Margaret M. Morrow
11 California corporation, and 3M
12 COMPANY, a Delaware
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
vs.
RMO, INC., d/b/a ROCKY
16 MOUNTAIN ORTHODONTICS, a
17
Colorado corporation,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs 3M Unitek Corporation and 3M Innovative Properties Company
("Plaintiffs") and Defendant RMO, Inc. ("RMO") have reached a settlement of the
above-referenced action and, pursuant to their settlement agreement, stipulate to entry
of Final Judgment as follows:
1.
United States Patent Nos. 6,776,614, 7,811,087 and Patent No. 7,850,451
(collectively, the "Patents-in-Suit") are duly issued, valid and
enforceable;
27
28
US_ACTIVE-112788254
1
2.
RMO's sale of customized lingual orthodontic brackets and appliances
2
manufactured by Lingaljet Othodontics ("Lingualjet") using a system of
3
3D modeling software and a virtual library of bracket bodies, which was
4
marketed as the Lingualjet system ("Accused Products") as identified and
5
described in Plaintiffs' Complaint filed in the above-captioned action,
6
infringed the Patents-in-Suit;
7
3.
RMO shall immediately cease and permanently refrain from making (or
the Accused Products, (b) any products that are no more than colorably
10
REED SMITH LLP
having made), using, importing, offering for sale, or selling anywhere (a)
9
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
8
different therefrom, and (c) any other products or systems that would
11
infringe any of the Patents-in-Suit.
12
4.
Plaintiffs' requests for money damages are dismissed.
13
5.
All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this
action.
14
15
6.
This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
16
settlement agreement, and resolve any disputes regarding compliance
17
with this Final Judgment.
18
19
20 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that final judgment is
21 hereby entered on the terms set forth above.
22
23
24
Dated: May 1, 2013
Margaret M. Morrow
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?