Tai Ham v. Synergy International Optronics LLC et al

Filing 35

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Having reviewed the [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER and finding good cause for the entry of a protective order in this case, the Court hereby orders as follows: The [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER is hereby entered as the Order of this Court. re Stipulation for Protective Order 34 (lmh)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BRANDON C. FERNALD (BAR NO. 222429)
FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP
510 W 6th Street, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90014
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
THOMAS A. BROWN II (Pro Hac Vice)
FENSTERSTOCK & PARTNERS LLP
100 Broadway, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10024
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants SYNERGY
INTERNATIONAL OPTRONICS, LLC,
SELECTRON MANAGEMENT CORP., and
RICHARD HEATHCOTE

13
14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18

TAI HAM, an individual, dba
SELECTRON INDUSTRIAL CO.,

19

Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DOCUMENT PREPARED
ON RECYCLED PAPER

v.
SYNERGY INTERNATIONAL
OPTRONICS, LLC, SELECTRON
MANAGEMENT CORP., a New
York Corporation and RICHARD
HEATHCOTE, an individual, and
DOES 1 to 20,
Defendants

) Case No. 12-cv-8642 (JCG)
)
)
)
)
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1

Having reviewed the [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2

and finding good cause for the entry of a protective order in this case, the Court

3

hereby orders as follows:

4
5
6

The [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER is hereby entered
as the Order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10

DATED: July 16, 2013

_/s/Jay C. Gandhi______________________
United States Magistrate Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DOCUMENT PREPARED
ON RECYCLED PAPER

-1-