Felicia Clark v. Caine and Weiner Company Inc et al
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT 15 This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc). Modified on 7/3/2013 (lc).
1
O
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FELICIA CLARK,
12
13
14
v.
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-08867-ODW (PLAx)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW COMPLAINT [15]
CAINE AND WEINER COMPANY, INC.
and DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
15
16
17
On June 18, 2013, Plaintiff Felicia Clark improperly noticed a motion to
18
withdraw complaint before Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for July 23, 2013. (ECF
19
No. 15.) The Court promptly re-set the motion before this Court (where it should
20
have been noticed) for July 22 at 1:30 p.m. (ECF No. 16.)
21
Defendant Caine and Weiner Company, Inc. failed to timely opposed Clark’s
22
motion. See L.R. 7-9 (the non-moving party shall file an opposition “not later than
23
twenty-one (21) days before the date designated for the hearing of the motion”). Such
24
inaction may be deemed consent to the granting of the motion. L.R 7-12. The Court
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
therefore GRANTS Clark’s motion.
2
This case is hereby DISMISSED without
prejudice.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
July 3, 2013
7
8
9
____________________________________
HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?