Joseph Odish et al v. Cognitive Code Corporation et al

Filing 306

ORDER RE: STIPULATION 305 DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HOWARD S FREDMAN, ESQ. (State Bar No. 046249) E-mail: hsflawyer@aol.com FREDMAN | LIEBERMAN| PEARL, LLP 1875 Century Park East, Suite 2230 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: 310/226-6796 Fax: 310/226-6797 JS-6 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Cognitive Code Corporation, and Defendants Leslie Spring, Mimi Chen, John Chen, and Sal DiFazio 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOSEPH ODISH; JOHN BOURBEAU; and CRANBROOK CAPITAL CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 vs. COGNITIVE CODE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; LESLIE SPRING; MIMI CHEN; JOHN CHEN; and SAL DIFAZIO, Defendants. 18 19 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12-cv-09069-FMO (JCGx) Hon. Fernando M. Olguin NO HEARING REQUESTED ORDER RE: STIPULATION [305] DISMISSING ACTION BY, AND COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST, BOURBEAU WITH PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: October 22, 2012 Trial Date: November 14, 2017 21 For good cause shown, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action by Plaintiff John 23 24 Bourbeau against all Defendants and the related Counterclaim by Counterclaimant 25 Cognitive Code Corporation against John Bourbeau, be and hereby are dismissed 26 /// 27 /// 28 -1Order Dismissing Action By, and Counterclaim Against, Bourbeau with Prejudice 1 with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), with each party to bear his, her or its 2 own fees and costs. 3 Dated: October 18, 2017 4 5 6 ____________/s/_______________ Hon. Fernando M. Olguin United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Order Dismissing Action By, and Counterclaim Against, Bourbeau with Prejudice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?