Joseph Odish et al v. Cognitive Code Corporation et al
Filing
306
ORDER RE: STIPULATION 305 DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Case Terminated; Made JS-6) (vdr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HOWARD S FREDMAN, ESQ. (State Bar No. 046249)
E-mail: hsflawyer@aol.com
FREDMAN | LIEBERMAN| PEARL, LLP
1875 Century Park East, Suite 2230
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: 310/226-6796 Fax: 310/226-6797
JS-6
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
Cognitive Code Corporation, and Defendants
Leslie Spring, Mimi Chen, John Chen, and Sal DiFazio
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOSEPH ODISH; JOHN BOURBEAU;
and CRANBROOK CAPITAL
CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, a
Michigan limited liability company,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
vs.
COGNITIVE CODE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation; LESLIE
SPRING; MIMI CHEN; JOHN CHEN;
and SAL DIFAZIO,
Defendants.
18
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 12-cv-09069-FMO
(JCGx)
Hon. Fernando M. Olguin
NO HEARING REQUESTED
ORDER RE: STIPULATION [305]
DISMISSING ACTION BY, AND
COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST,
BOURBEAU WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint Filed: October 22, 2012
Trial Date: November 14, 2017
21
For good cause shown,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action by Plaintiff John
23
24
Bourbeau against all Defendants and the related Counterclaim by Counterclaimant
25
Cognitive Code Corporation against John Bourbeau, be and hereby are dismissed
26
///
27
///
28
-1Order Dismissing Action By, and Counterclaim Against, Bourbeau with Prejudice
1
with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), with each party to bear his, her or its
2
own fees and costs.
3
Dated: October 18, 2017
4
5
6
____________/s/_______________
Hon. Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Order Dismissing Action By, and Counterclaim Against, Bourbeau with Prejudice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?