Roberto Herrera v. Connie Gipson

Filing 27

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt Re Amended Report and Recommendation 22 : Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Amended Report and Recomm endation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERTO HERRERA,

12
13
14

Petitioner,
vs.
CONNIE GIPSON,

15

Respondent.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 12-9457-JAK (DTB)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records

18 and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States
19 Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation have
20 been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the
21 Amended Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the
22 Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the
23 Magistrate Judge.
24

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition

25 and dismissing this action with prejudice.
26 DATED: May 31, 2013
27

JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1